Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:110776 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 93235 invoked from network); 29 Jun 2020 15:21:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.localdomain) (76.75.200.58) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 29 Jun 2020 15:21:47 -0000 To: internals@lists.php.net References: Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2020 15:10:28 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Posted-By: 87.81.129.66 Subject: Re: [RFC] Property write visibility From: marandall@php.net (Mark Randall) Message-ID: On 29/06/2020 10:41, André Rømcke wrote: > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/property_write_visibility I'd like this feature as a stop-gap for accessors. However, I don't like the syntax at all, I couldn't reasonably vote for it in its current suggested state. I think it's just too messy. I'm not sure what the alternative should be though. It seems like the accessor syntax would be the only long-term clean way. Mark Randall