Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:110658 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 38252 invoked from network); 18 Jun 2020 14:54:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.localdomain) (76.75.200.58) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 18 Jun 2020 14:54:29 -0000 To: internals@lists.php.net References: Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2020 14:40:26 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Posted-By: 87.81.129.66 Subject: Re: [RFC] [VOTE] Shorter Attribute Syntax From: marandall@php.net (Mark Randall) Message-ID: On 18/06/2020 00:59, Theodore Brown wrote: > I've opened voting on the Shorter Attribute Syntax RFC: > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/shorter_attribute_syntax I'd be wary of @@ simply because if we do add validation to them, we would likely want to use the suppression operator to indicate that a class might be omitted (such as if an optional package is not installed). At which point we're left with @@@ and that's getting into silly-land. Mark Randall marandall@php.net