Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:110644 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 60576 invoked from network); 18 Jun 2020 07:00:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 18 Jun 2020 07:00:58 -0000 Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D936C1804C8 for ; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 22:46:46 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-ASN: AS15169 209.85.128.0/17 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from mail-wr1-f51.google.com (mail-wr1-f51.google.com [209.85.221.51]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 22:46:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wr1-f51.google.com with SMTP id h5so4665069wrc.7 for ; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 22:46:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=beberlei-de.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=WeXI3ewl80U5Jg3czpfY0suc5IL4y/8iOaTkFzIoQwI=; b=v2Wfh8TlTXdVS2uiijuH5Gg8d8IExxAI7nfVkhi69odftgD3GPD7gLwTfVgSD4cnIP GyAKLjSzjyro/4tBmHekrqB3MUlx/pY6w18WEgGG3SuQppCF67XSGraFkWRPlpxJ2WRk ItApIJEndqLzeolvntQO11JlqCEfFHp8kKyjEOOEc06vyQxMmIKkOEy1Cctpc6ujDjq2 l6bpBw5Kx6lr1zA8T7WxVxnn2KvKIHTW7rtEZ1R2bPAUZRM9jBabLWqj+ejKuePN1mxb iq9kgpRddNxPByprsyMlx9ONPPkh58zyVLlcg6VngQ7pZLduh1HKgr73HGgz1hG0Cj16 otaQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=WeXI3ewl80U5Jg3czpfY0suc5IL4y/8iOaTkFzIoQwI=; b=sV99mVqie2HzovbUeTy/teWdQQpPSZNjBooIrsJXPM4PCdtpxZ2ODQJY6CfyL6/ZVZ rIAx92tqcaa+/2JoVIgkn+8Ab3L+SlcjoOpDkGzUXnX3JFsq331UgcneOotBy31T1NjK R6TpWRE4E5cLtEdPpiSwbLApw2iUPuZNdTRJ3a0owUBYd/Ts+EcVfGado7dzUlwJ6ceM BVp8r6XFUZPxy/WWtD2+x6UePUIW1F1Wc8BAVHjjLCkiR5508axrzHOz7VR7lLd1pGid Vzk/cOdhrK+bYht912VQT0hyEATZ7KRpRyLHITvJYPdoLaEI5rNQ1Bia/hxtCovkzARU xiHA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531sQbT565AbBkUuGK5PdVKMQyt3wxWQje9wFYVmTIiiXA1dgmFc vyv35zINArCYpexzQV57io2mnqjz837vl6yiDKU9ww== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyYq2SluAVVdlQaz+8t+RP7da3QZGJozUdu1ToEr0f7p7zH4MU8YdTnSDyl3ljPpx/Ajejrzv9OS9Tq3A9UJBw= X-Received: by 2002:a5d:5306:: with SMTP id e6mr1474064wrv.39.1592459202248; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 22:46:42 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2020 07:46:31 +0200 Message-ID: To: Theodore Brown Cc: internals Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000011d16705a8554daf" Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] [VOTE] Shorter Attribute Syntax From: kontakt@beberlei.de (Benjamin Eberlei) --00000000000011d16705a8554daf Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 1:59 AM Theodore Brown wrote: > Hi internals, > > I've opened voting on the Shorter Attribute Syntax RFC: > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/shorter_attribute_syntax > > Since all RFCs require a primary vote with a 2/3 majority, there is > a main vote to approve the secondary ranked-choice vote. > > For the ranked-choice poll, fill in your first through third syntax > choices, making sure not to select the same syntax more than > once. You don't have to vote for all three options, but please > don't leave gaps. > > Voting will end in two weeks, on 2020-07-01. > Thank you for working on this RFC. The syntax question for Attributes is a really hot topic and I think it is a good idea to have a re-vote with more varied options than before. The two new options now proposed didn't even cross my and Martin's mind for the original RFC, because we strictly looked at syntaxes with no BC breaks. Both @@ and #[] introduce very small, but also easily detectable and fixable (via grep + sed or tools of choice). > > Best regards, > Theodore > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: https://www.php.net/unsub.php > > --00000000000011d16705a8554daf--