Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:110561 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 78672 invoked from network); 16 Jun 2020 02:02:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 16 Jun 2020 02:02:51 -0000 Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A76681804FD for ; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 17:48:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-ASN: AS15169 209.85.128.0/17 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from mail-ej1-f51.google.com (mail-ej1-f51.google.com [209.85.218.51]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 17:48:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ej1-f51.google.com with SMTP id l12so19505512ejn.10 for ; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 17:48:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=29vw59lkSY65o3yWJZ7xuQZ1MSjC7tl1SagA5jaf9yM=; b=mseQcs8/Sm6AK6FtcMBbN+/P3nNKKsfv/woznLVojcQuXDoo+g0UQMwBTPA2L1aDW5 qKEmZhgHGXjiNDwThgdYzAXUAKGWhkF8sW3MdiaFlBWebQpqJs2bWoZTgFZSYimBoRO5 441fEzNj6yuOd8shJINvlC/yNjovGoDzxrAbKb432WdSwsgjV4X8L5V3OvU6z1TgjLLA yhBimTQYE+cJsategSqVOqFZXxO8wG0EoCswN+p3MsuckbajbtvYALM9d6ONi0Q6vbp3 Usd11eWwVCMTXeBeo647SBU5FYhugkemQsHZ0RfTHt4fmor40Jc/kpmyJunHg910eoyp 0dTw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=29vw59lkSY65o3yWJZ7xuQZ1MSjC7tl1SagA5jaf9yM=; b=etLE/4DPchhCnmkwV1Kv9vq8vf3wK2EumpYxyxl0O0mGqJPDHG+QjpKdZU+nJomKuL 0oVDZ2Ev4cy6Kwo6JibdiCfco1NufHYBLBdecp5LZpE0Mpun8m23UNvJhj12cG0ZDwcG ys09D5sJTI5qfN2gc5UY6YPk6IknxxG7sUCcovfeB85tYb/T80lldOErPaFm6L1qT2sF pFqEZheN4x+f3X2XyKQvi84Wmc/sqAK3M0ENQgqM8JvmxE2vlxGz2U8lAzUhppNfo2is pYQwsSPgGlY8gieL8cNjR8oC6cqXST99iD/4qFd02+p4FkAd6FxLwlBBwJ7LTWmfkkXx /BfQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530bT+LtbogN9nHXUAbf0ZLZZ5S5+/HKt5S99DRU0XkGT4cKYAIf snItDD7HvHWdXU1md3NYie3zAt+zEXs1T1/HWMgSL5uS X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzrcc8Zy+f5sRtc+TXOcIgKg+0WZHwmzU6Lw/aQvY9gMSgjPH22wd5uqnatFtJIntK0ysUcZiPn0hXapCFy9XE= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:4ecf:: with SMTP id i15mr399655ejv.515.1592268483869; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 17:48:03 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2020 02:47:53 +0200 Message-ID: To: Benas IML Cc: PHP Internals List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000005e403105a828e5b0" Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] [DISCUSSION] Allow void return type for constructors/destructors From: george.banyard@gmail.com ("G. P. B.") --0000000000005e403105a828e5b0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Tue, 16 Jun 2020 at 02:35, Benas IML wrote: > Hey internals, > > I am proposing to allow void return type for constructors/destructors. > Note, > that this is an **optional** and cosmetic-only addition! All of the > reasoning > is in the RFC. > > RFC: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/constructor_return_type > > Best regards, > Benas > Seems like a no brainer and a good addition. :) Best regards George P. Banyard --0000000000005e403105a828e5b0--