Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:110550 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 41932 invoked from network); 16 Jun 2020 00:38:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 16 Jun 2020 00:38:38 -0000 Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BF621804C3 for ; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 16:23:56 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-ASN: AS15169 209.85.128.0/17 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from mail-pj1-f65.google.com (mail-pj1-f65.google.com [209.85.216.65]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 16:23:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pj1-f65.google.com with SMTP id ga6so559173pjb.1 for ; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 16:23:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ozOjejLzqyIgKfCeWy7XgJUSaoZSq6l5xHs4n2Hf16Y=; b=k2xilbwwkx2MoACQBr/R0Nyf97SoLtfYx59k7eG93R+w6dnVkswmWvLqfdr4ezv4/Z 37oh+RnkKryEyxCM0KIEYTwq9hgNkPvAo2jjCEgYdT1jW1t9CGJL5D0I8FN6w24GAQYZ TEHwPAkVvrQFZQjULpgzxTvaHJUken41ykHnH4y8Qah9kE9/ktITGNIRjUntI32sJrAA NyWkS36ufLieu6Qq19Kpi3y3qAHQibYtLzZYvC8e5MSn6fyWRZfFztDfykEXzYVFEp5y NTJjELTsL2bOslJ/qBKf+9Jk+wAQ/VKd2Jq4AoQh3nv03tMH8o7mSQy6A2m/EJyxItZD 3GPw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532qaKoH+O6c39qirqVvnswMLHP4UFabybSvMvJ2XiQ7+DwcP0Uq 4r84vJ45NkRPOWbK8INoH4ZyFCBYANmZf1fDwTE= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx1KKS+JdFs9K4q2HkFBlWF7nTJoKqsdxnxf3ugfLJQXbrYYI7Y/JTQkwqK0xRmuEFSrRZTBcja2+Dcpk9A7H4= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:240c:: with SMTP id h12mr65212pje.42.1592263434977; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 16:23:54 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4b921c5f-db2b-1e2a-ed2a-1add5c9b6663@gmail.com> <20200615174645.GP14030@phcomp.co.uk> In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2020 02:23:41 +0300 Message-ID: To: Deleu Cc: Lynn , PHP internals Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] About the use of the terms master/slave and blacklist, proposal to replace. From: kalle@php.net (Kalle Sommer Nielsen) Den tir. 16. jun. 2020 kl. 02.12 skrev Deleu : > > > I am sorry but I do not think you understand the scale of which the > > PHP project is at. > > I'm sorry but you did not get my point. As mentioned above theres 170 pla= ces mentioning the term blacklist. When I said "the argument of BC without = knowing the scope" I meant to express that perhaps 1, 10 or 100 of these co= uld be changed without any BC impact, meaning that perhaps they barely need= an RFC in the first place as it could potentially be just internal code. I= nstead of being negative and dismissive of a chance at a diverse and welcom= ing environment, let's see what we can easily do first and take the first s= tep towards making a statement in favor of a better community. So let me get this straight, you feel uneasy that internally in PHP there is something called blacklist, a variable or something that, and changing those are making a statement in favor of a better community. Well that is also a biased opinion, I am certain we can dispute what is better for the community for days without end. What purpose does it serve to change the internal variables from blacklist to blocklist when it still needs to interact with the term blacklist, why would we use two different terminologies for the same thing? I am being negative towards this change because like I have stated before that it is a change for the sake of change and I do not find the justifications presented here to be strong enough reason to break working code because you feel offended by some political propaganda that has made you believe that blacklist is a racial slur, or whatever it might be. Censoring industry terms that has correlation to racial remarks whatsoever sends a signal that "Hey the PHP project would rather allow breaking your code because it needs to be diverse", what happens when the next flavor of the month term comes that needs to be censored for whatever reason, should we then also break that? Because if that was the case we could do that nonstop. I still don't think it will make the community better by breaking already working code. To say that the current naming is not diverse and welcoming is almost disrespectful in itself. --=20 regards, Kalle Sommer Nielsen kalle@php.net