Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:110273 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 16527 invoked from network); 25 May 2020 21:32:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 25 May 2020 21:32:53 -0000 Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E88F11804C3 for ; Mon, 25 May 2020 13:12:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-ASN: AS15169 209.85.128.0/17 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from mail-lj1-f179.google.com (mail-lj1-f179.google.com [209.85.208.179]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Mon, 25 May 2020 13:12:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lj1-f179.google.com with SMTP id k5so21924586lji.11 for ; Mon, 25 May 2020 13:12:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=TPfw+Z8Nd9SApyD5OyB/5+nlq+UB0Eo1+hyNUOHZHAI=; b=tyGeQ2wYWcjyGXM2WlAJFzD9Vnpp6+1o/cxRjwlKfcZ4rykRncToZzfSoJ09SK4lVC HWgppav0Kla7pV07kbxgfV9+/p+DP/MioLDy/9r3IFP7woQOy9WSIV8uajwzhTaGQvEV cqL8Jz1NfD8G2WyLilwyMgFS5OdO2f0xglCzuC3TM6n1iC643zAMPscqNWan+mRvTaqN 2yEgF5eeX10J/C1N1ukQAnyEtXPNdSq8f1sXOaeII58kGjA0Kdp6iWkugmLsPpmZQnOu 252AfUbPUY1efhIzBFifYNUZcksgrC4rxdrcnKjEQBIoGI2WTIEihuAOGxPdi5Swgg7A DEIQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=TPfw+Z8Nd9SApyD5OyB/5+nlq+UB0Eo1+hyNUOHZHAI=; b=GnV6V3UndQkJwYYHNj524xcQ26ULsl3gLYM0pY5giWozKkDAhGKGZqDB9ptQH/ds6F iKVpp/crNXRi4qMS67CfuAKWCSA3Wyh7PEg4uWN+Oeb8vLqv8YkQnG7KL4qTt6FJ9cvZ 5KDiGPYchefMpPYryqQ0wsm8HkbAEml0NugjBNiC3LTpuu6fwyaksAJHZ5OZmvCLfgqX DBuFdyPFLF+dGk+LbtiMkqK7UjLziPkY4bPH6LHqL90Q4nGQX+Q2okyeoTkukmzxPfLB EbO8tsAZ8Kfal+PGYqyMQ6667aMIEnLhwPVKrIxo7HDna+qeRZO7oo9jtq3WInVWN9aA jwCg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5323CZXejK/QcX41IT133O7SXFuUDB//eiqA3ckWbzShn4PfcRUS UFak2AxmY/32+cEN/LlqcbAINyIDPAI3woShj8E= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw+S7O70zvlKPl7vfXbzG/1KjQXDSGSTmcHg/4BztDDjBIty9Q8V0QiV+KJNwPfoVq4glwhrSCfoq50x0lDDCA= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:b6cc:: with SMTP id m12mr8872180ljo.96.1590437564219; Mon, 25 May 2020 13:12:44 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 25 May 2020 23:12:32 +0300 Message-ID: To: Rowan Tommins Cc: PHP Internals List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000000d84cc05a67e9aab" Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Amendments to Attributes From: benas.molis.iml@gmail.com (Benas IML) --0000000000000d84cc05a67e9aab Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" That's a brilliant idea, completely agreed, Rowan! On the other note, don't want to nitpick here but I believe that it would be better to name the repeatable attribute simply as `<>`. It would match other languages (such as Java) and the naming wouldn't be that verbose. Also IMO, I think for consistency we should either use only parameters e. g. `<>` or separate attributes for both target validation and repeatability e. g. `<>` and `<>`. Best regards, Benas Seliuginas --0000000000000d84cc05a67e9aab--