Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:110264 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 85654 invoked from network); 23 May 2020 00:53:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 23 May 2020 00:53:21 -0000 Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06D70180211 for ; Fri, 22 May 2020 16:32:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_NONE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-ASN: AS11403 66.111.4.0/24 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Fri, 22 May 2020 16:32:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB19C5C0088 for ; Fri, 22 May 2020 19:32:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: from imap26 ([10.202.2.76]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 22 May 2020 19:32:37 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=ccjyyW oyYrdsbT3JOSsYSWy02uzUNR7rL929kLy2T64=; b=hD+GLX5Gf7hv9WojBG+kHz /96HMwk7OWb+MSkX+mkdoTGKlCshN+rP4c6YXzlALvntkK1WMo9Q4A9oXTYHl1UF vIlQoKId8J5xMgJKh+GWHrUAldQX0tMTALpWP38eJfkqbkksWpI9IWrCPUilyf7L 7iauTmf0HylW96Bav9UhF2xrZNs2OLJtPz5hrA+1wSzby7Q+1ysMHt7xSJgXsVhi 0Wsdnj2S7LF/Y1MOSUSi5MMUU689EdcCwQ94N4CESu3bOcPGDdJ42wvXYWk4wmQ+ DoNzkx0VXB/9a2UNLeoY3WsJomQkA6LjpJ2TgWcY7ZBc2/dmhixRPYYPjX33IRnQ == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduhedruddugedgvdduucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepofgfggfkjghffffhvffutgesthdtredtreertdenucfhrhhomhepfdfnrghr rhihucfirghrfhhivghlugdfuceolhgrrhhrhiesghgrrhhfihgvlhguthgvtghhrdgtoh hmqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeeglefgkeduiedvvdetffeujefftdfhjeeiveehgfff keduveektddvledvvdfffeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmh grihhlfhhrohhmpehlrghrrhihsehgrghrfhhivghlughtvggthhdrtghomh X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 6079614200A2; Fri, 22 May 2020 19:32:37 -0400 (EDT) X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.3.0-dev0-488-g9249dd4-fm-20200522.001-g9249dd48 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <2df546c4-c8c1-4c0f-8ef4-a51bf1b2f4d2@www.fastmail.com> In-Reply-To: References: <41139a8e-7e32-484c-826b-de407d5eca4b@www.fastmail.com> Date: Fri, 22 May 2020 18:32:16 -0500 To: "php internals" Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC][DISCUSSION] Match expression v2 From: larry@garfieldtech.com ("Larry Garfield") On Fri, May 22, 2020, at 10:42 AM, Ilija Tovilo wrote: > Hi Larry > > > My one question is why you're not including the implicit "match (true)" > > in this version, when the secondary vote on the previous RFC was > > 80% in favor of it. > > I received quite a bit of feedback that the RFC was too complex. I > tried to make the RFC simpler by removing all non-essential parts. I'm > ready to create a follow up RFC for this (although it would probably > not make PHP 8.0). Hm. A logical argument, but given its overwhelming support before and that it's therefore almost certain to pass in the future, I don't see why it's a net win to have PHP 8.0 missing that bit. It seemed uncontroversial, and seems like a highly common use case. --Larry Garfield