Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:110261 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 14132 invoked from network); 22 May 2020 21:27:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 22 May 2020 21:27:58 -0000 Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECA38180509 for ; Fri, 22 May 2020 13:07:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-ASN: AS15169 209.85.128.0/17 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from mail-il1-f177.google.com (mail-il1-f177.google.com [209.85.166.177]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Fri, 22 May 2020 13:07:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-il1-f177.google.com with SMTP id m6so11863061ilq.7 for ; Fri, 22 May 2020 13:07:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=TPD+mXwS4/G6N9dy4nfnXe8bPqslRqzxoNdcQZxUYqw=; b=qWkUW/2cRGWla8v435BS8oNhzsP2cspP6th2E3MqzU+0+Bbgio2JvwW0lmGVenviEb Z+0V7X/GAvA3MX3sO6AUtw6PHFPYZcoxhUxuZZvhEwXGe8M/UXMotxHTMFLaXU9KtlWX KnY72gaPti7+ROfgLdHDCgrahfJVvIegfnSQncG5vkXsq/1ANpjRii4OPyuEkGPZqZeK 9XlUxWqYpfjkoPyy8pJfa7LsiEcBGBVZpM1ABTPu0WsXMzaUcuyR7MYbkUwC+Q0Juxqb Z/PO96HZkWL5Bpk+2Z6V65bu+Q3RJiaQ4Pe3z3WqjL/mEq55rxYC7ZZWQdaB0KX3nFOP hfMQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=TPD+mXwS4/G6N9dy4nfnXe8bPqslRqzxoNdcQZxUYqw=; b=mnCDvlMryGAG2SRoR51JE03tCrKrX3pUuZAwbPGcBgF4P0j18SQ2JGzEKZNdDi7suO ljaizrm7+WImo2XBc1q34bw7DgStLS6AfDTafYLml5lRLLmABtf5IZx2u3qmaJFaoZgl dzNF+VGZU74pzDNCHHTGKVAbZ4nV8yIKH6bJwU3g7e7n0CYYd5uUMllQpQOzkqp23ieV J2y+YPAXNWZzgKXjvdPIyP5wVtREAPXhqwnf2vPqnkFx9QNb2ruqo9OAPiPerk/rUlk5 8RBr7DIA07+f3kKQdVzboccOEx3bWxiqkyYemIKU43KGfKUoKHE+cGyrmCR1btQ1JQXb x7mw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533D7FhwcPhJIqwaXrfbq0Y1qSrss8Mdw/tnticAbAmrfTH0A9c2 jxeU4kFaYz78Fh+sW3ZYtaQtC0FUTCoEUKSix1k= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxjAYQiVO8g7e7yEWdXVAcqBqsKpSbja447pqE8MCRkVLESVwD9VXRkm6WxgipTOIacPtru8mgoGT3Dmn8h6kg= X-Received: by 2002:a92:d4d0:: with SMTP id o16mr10018577ilm.91.1590178029636; Fri, 22 May 2020 13:07:09 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 22 May 2020 23:06:57 +0300 Message-ID: To: Marco Pivetta Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?Pedro_Magalh=C3=A3es?= , PHP internals Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000009610c005a6422c52" Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] [Discussion] Remove inappropriate inheritance signature checks on private methods From: weirdan@gmail.com (Bruce Weirdan) --0000000000009610c005a6422c52 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 7:26 PM Marco Pivetta wrote: > Overall, this RFC breaks some design capabilities that are within the > language, specifically around `__`-prefixed methods in the language. Wouldn't your use cases be covered by `protected final` though, as proposed by Pedro? -- Best regards, Bruce Weirdan mailto: weirdan@gmail.com --0000000000009610c005a6422c52--