Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:110223
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAEPJdum6xCwABjpor1YYvuosSB1dEb4xnCZEMABKsEEvNXvcQQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CADyq6sLx7BkG=m4=Fkxjc+tDnQB7+xz-R1BihyHPTTM+tB0-DA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CADyq6sLx7BkG=m4=Fkxjc+tDnQB7+xz-R1BihyHPTTM+tB0-DA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 May 2020 23:31:31 +0200
Message-ID: <CAEPJdu=34dhTk0sc-NkWzjAWLjNg+=QJvi4=SG89JkDm5tp3Ng@mail.gmail.com>
To: Marco Pivetta <ocramius@gmail.com>
Cc: PHP Internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000004b73e605a61b1f32"
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Amendments to Attributes
From: kontakt@beberlei.de (Benjamin Eberlei)

--0000000000004b73e605a61b1f32
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 7:37 PM Marco Pivetta <ocramius@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hey Benjamin,
> <http://ocramius.github.com/>
>
>
> On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 7:08 PM Benjamin Eberlei <kontakt@beberlei.de>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> the Attributes RFC was rather large already, so a few things were left
>> open
>> or discussions during the vote have made us rethink a things.
>>
>> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/attribute_amendments
>>
>> These points are handled by the Amendments RFC to Attributes:
>>
>> 1. Proposing to add a grouped syntax <<Attr1, Attr2>
>> 2. Rename PhpAttribute to Attribute in global namespace (independent of
>> the
>> namespace RFC)
>> 3. Add validation of attribute class targets, which internal attributes
>> can
>> do, but userland can't
>> 4. Specification if an attribute is repeatable or not on the same
>> declaration and fail otherwise.
>>
>> Each of them is a rather small issue, so I hope its ok to aggregate all
>> four of them in a single RFC. Please let me know if it's not.
>>
>
>
> Do you hope to get nested attributes to 8.0, or is it something you'd
> prefer to happen at a later time?
>

Martin evaluated the technical requirements in more detail and we discussed
with others that the timeframe is probably to short to get all the details
fleshed out :-( So we are going to table that for 8.1

>
> Marco Pivetta
>
> http://twitter.com/Ocramius
>
> http://ocramius.github.com/
>

--0000000000004b73e605a61b1f32--