Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:110148 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 4980 invoked from network); 12 May 2020 17:02:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 12 May 2020 17:02:28 -0000 Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E580180538 for ; Tue, 12 May 2020 08:39:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_ALL, DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,SPF_PASS,T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-ASN: AS51395 185.32.220.0/22 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from upstairs.ofcourseimright.com (upstairs.ofcourseimright.com [185.32.222.29]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Tue, 12 May 2020 08:39:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.61.72.13] ([173.38.220.50]) (authenticated bits=0) by upstairs.ofcourseimright.com (8.15.2/8.15.2/Debian-10) with ESMTPSA id 04CFd3fJ039287 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 12 May 2020 17:39:04 +0200 Authentication-Results: upstairs.ofcourseimright.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lear.ch DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=lear.ch; s=upstairs; t=1589297945; bh=ME5R0yrD9hcTnzFj5/VDKqRaBHZepoodtAi4z/iIS78=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=SRk2811RvpvGv8CofwcCIKxdFiLpToU8ty2aa2IzOaSFNmVLNWtylIK4/O2MNrRaV DuOa7Z30qYvQamHSRt1cFKmoi0wZiliopf/V2Vr5/etgvRMdPHs1s1jnnbB1JnuOdZ QVK2vHQ0/QG3KpwaYA5C6q9gUVX2uD5fl1D7z3is= To: "G. P. B." , "Christoph M. Becker" Cc: PHP internals References: <8c7f1f4d-e12f-7bd6-73e8-a491937e46b2@gmx.de> Autocrypt: addr=lear@lear.ch; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= mQENBFMe1UQBCADdYOS5APDpIpF2ohAxB+nxg1GpAYr8iKwGIb86Wp9NkK5+QwbW9H035clT lpVLciExtN8E3MCTPOIm7aITPlruixAVwlBY3g7U9eRppSw9O2H/7bie2GOnYxqmsw4v1yNZ 9NcMLlD8raY0UcQ5r698c8JD4xUTLqybZXaK2sPeJkxzT+IwupRSQ+vXEvFFGhERQ88zo5Ca Sa1Gw/Rv54oH0Dq2XYkO41rhxQ60BKZLZuQK1d9+1y3I+An3AJeD3AA31fJZD3H8YRKOBgqe ILPILbw1mM7gCtCjfvFCt6AFCwEsjITGx55ceoQ+t5B5XGYJEppMWsIFrwZsfbL+gP31ABEB AAG0GUVsaW90IExlYXIgPGxlYXJAbGVhci5jaD6JAU4EEwECADgCGwMCHgECF4AWIQSY0L2Q Rh2wkqeyYR2HtmtG2dJ6MwUCWxJwMwULCQgHAgYVCAkKCwIEFgIDAQAKCRCHtmtG2dJ6M8KI B/46pFrJX+4Ockl2fHR303ais9Lyx8jv6mXKKOr8WR0UYcJ0syQrhaaZNG1VV98tYQHHK9F5 y7hH4YCsrr3odZ6zoavnx5X1X/2xw8y732f/irVoOOkYLid9IGPxa2e2nYXCZpde5/yvv3we XVE4mG4dEAD5T8iKS4Hz/3fKGJQ15o79Jv92HgC7RpCt0WaiQ0b6acP3PuwjDJzJzLFZzb7j IiB3izxQESSWE1GNRmoAK/k0gW6kmx1/87tQENrK+3Nn4CJSFQWF6entLnY7UeVm95wbMQkJ evwddDWUO2huDbmZnmxgKXGzSSpuNq7n8ICAOlbt0HfdJAZQfy25bwveuQENBFMe1UQBCAC0 WV7Ydbv95xYGPhthTdChBIpPtl7JPCV/c6/3iEmvjpfGuFNaK4Macj9le20EA5A1BH7PgLGo HOiPM65NysRpZ96RRVX3TNfLmhGMFr5hPOGNdq+xcGHVutmwPV9U7bKeUNRiPFx3YdEkExdd qV2E8FltT0x2FSKe2xszPPHB6gVtMckX5buI9p1K3fbVhXdvEkcYY/jB0JEJGyhS5aEbct5c HUvDAkT81/YFK5Jfg8RRwu1q1t1YuIJSOWAZQ9J9oUsg6D9RpClU+tIFBoe3iTp1AUfJcypu cGKgLYKtpu/aygcpQONHYkYW5003mPsrajFhReVF5veycMbHs4u5ABEBAAGJAR8EGAECAAkF AlMe1UQCGwwACgkQh7ZrRtnSejOSuQgA27p2rYB7Kh20dym6V8c62pWpBHHTgxr/32zevxHS iXl6xvUCg5T8WUwfUk8OvgDcBErK/blDAMXQzSg3sp450JhR8RnXHXF5Zz2T04X7HnlIVJGw f2CjnwyEAJCqMzaCmI+g3Imvg/8L4nyBFvhlFHDv+kIvMiujyycjPAu7xxKplBs1/IEwmDoA MjneFmawvfeQnwdMhSKK8PjKSuzGU5uUmxj3GBfRqvTM0qpmhMPFOmDhJSmH55HLAky2Mlmq JYXJPt/9EfSEhFiua1M6gLiuNEuPkp+8jcnHQqKr0IeHt8UqcwLt2mGfIyl0FVdF9hvWPjNR zGbgqoT1Di03RQ== Message-ID: Date: Tue, 12 May 2020 17:39:03 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: PR #5251 adds support for CMS (RFC5662) From: lear@lear.ch (Eliot Lear) Hi! On 12.05.20 17:10, G. P. B. wrote: > Does this really require an RFC? > This seems like just exposing some underlying functionality from OpenSSL > to userland which I wouldn't have expected to need an RFC to be added. Whether or not you wish to use the full process (voting and all) is not something I can comment on, but I will say that just writing out the RFC helped me realize that I could improve a few things in the code.  I also pretty much wrote out the documentation for the calling interface in the draft RFC.  I hope this will prove useful. Eliot