Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:109906 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 25826 invoked from network); 29 Apr 2020 09:13:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 29 Apr 2020 09:13:36 -0000 Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EF3E1804E2 for ; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 00:46:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-ASN: AS15169 209.85.128.0/17 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from mail-ot1-f52.google.com (mail-ot1-f52.google.com [209.85.210.52]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 00:46:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ot1-f52.google.com with SMTP id 72so944511otu.1 for ; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 00:46:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=d0+/bOcyeGbvhEQIlrj5yPr1JvXBF/KEA+GOkpxr4UA=; b=jhTIq2L4R+OpEZvvseeEZmIM4HuIgtczOXOhkgD6nblYpDIdfaXb02HrOn1/tQfXCX d+e0K/MGKUtgvL3bG6o6Jq7ow95jHVBJxwfgK7Q8VX+F6QxEzJ/OnjrVgQNrH0hE7MlG 8SmgxwNQ6rMBsDkPQQXgyghwnYDlmJh2dCHsUIasHjIY3kVjAi8fZknF9K1/Ev6hRk1/ HO4NWa9HmLJGOusgGjTPBuS4VyfrsLkZn264AJvnndvxSUwoivpQOU+S7w+qYGnuJXc+ gP6TnX2jYKPorDGJ0Hd0PhhymkqIeDL7MTJPUGgGZynp7O5ptjBulCCm/jkAm/FTEzhM WsLQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=d0+/bOcyeGbvhEQIlrj5yPr1JvXBF/KEA+GOkpxr4UA=; b=Pz/AO+nHEia4xmzbP4IDgNjRfVVwr7K+0vyEtTifrZMZd+OKMX5ygHlr0HuBANLmY8 KCrSHkWmMcI02PDG/ZoY5SPPI2Qb+ZnfbPzMXvbV2kWqcjilf54W75KeYdZO/fxnreoJ OSobEkH9sIIZG0VlhJ9yeffRaFjzQyYSOMr+ytdZ/wR5TI4IGSaUnuCOP0tHxEuYnzyK FdlFkmCk6LFobQNw4W+H6MZERr/XPV+e7FHvMZiNmh0qXzFBwHCK2/n8ot9E5uC6u2fh bLAjUjDd+YNbLIviJJmoWZmEOOw2e8pmWDDwUVdgNa3JKKpD7bnwi9w9irHQQzbHSaok bMkw== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuYWBh/6LO0oFJFetiWdMgDVFY3+RA7VVSwjk7vhQgi8n4g2igM4 sIqb47uOzd8pGZ3dg2WgbhiuWOpR7YhIWldCG9Y= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypLaRS8dToJzMlh09pcNzzdTVct8bfgX3/0xExU7vlLSlV+iIZObbEWGL4sjZVR51tFww4f8kGi5rvvWVSXB1cg= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:120e:: with SMTP id r14mr2639871otp.232.1588146418472; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 00:46:58 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <76b72148-4b3a-4a63-ab4c-245439a94823@www.fastmail.com> In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2020 09:46:46 +0200 Message-ID: To: Nikita Popov Cc: Larry Garfield , php internals Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000001fdd0105a469279f" Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [RFC] Constructor Property Promotion From: nicolas.grekas+php@gmail.com (Nicolas Grekas) --0000000000001fdd0105a469279f Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" > I think it might be best to apply to "both" and provide an isPromoted() > method on both ReflectionParameter and ReflectionProperty. Any code that > wishes to validate the allowed positions of an attribute can then skip > properties/parameters that report isPromoted() as true, to avoid reporting > false positives. > That sounds good. Deal on my side. Nicolas --0000000000001fdd0105a469279f--