Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:109694 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 75175 invoked from network); 17 Apr 2020 12:19:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 17 Apr 2020 12:19:46 -0000 Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E44E1804B4 for ; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 03:50:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-ASN: AS15169 209.85.128.0/17 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from mail-wm1-f52.google.com (mail-wm1-f52.google.com [209.85.128.52]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 03:50:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wm1-f52.google.com with SMTP id r26so2512361wmh.0 for ; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 03:50:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=beberlei-de.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=S9vEvBTjVxtH7JUwwtiv0Hhd33c2kXrTairMP1/XHqU=; b=Tlmlu0kER9bnLvyNk4nszg3qrTrb/HvS/QS8y+YxSVuHg1AFTEnyxhMNsgkj1kptLs 4IB6t1BlXxW87Rh8FNU8OIoMZo146O1lqwWqXxmwA1PLijSUBaPEpxPe+laNZzXqyXZs 7Qmk93BTVeVra6jKKRcWhOO99qlNlpGvxCcOemWtPxlv30kyRZQpi4ZDJo+kQgC1Gz8Q Ws8aTjemicTEKhdwdc8oo6t0Oo2Q26tWS7Umy3yQ4E0J5rlCjxMwevbEGO59Qg4nw5az JUwrV0CX9VwPEFNcFhnK9kXg+M4I5V4ThTAgqTqncWqHj8D6g1BWGRMkGQKHwwpWMcg7 Tquw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=S9vEvBTjVxtH7JUwwtiv0Hhd33c2kXrTairMP1/XHqU=; b=dypXCqErOzFwjRzfJONM2woH2gKeZ48EFBNnZawfpkfXGsNNPNtZXLNRv7ul14MVAE GB0lkHs2svXlMFOuVfiNA+AoyfxMLo5QNWmbDxrYLWjg3dYFwgkONaWRkfd2TnhXP4gI 9+QO2tbGtaz0gNzMBn9uK8PHiQdd8F5guPSHFsr/isjgiEPoefPj3WzqJTPE/dys1mYz apgD0ClqpAzbygNV5bxqg3SizQUtCXQDX/raw+u2+TqgrT4tUImfdmPXwM+QR0tlINeg eKO9QkDvrgiTUaH68d0f4zz7wsAJUzsrkKDQAU8j0oAdKPoGB9r9GvJdLkbcJaPUQKCF Jf2g== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuYwnuYbkrYnEEovziLdWZyfVuXUWxaszOBJg5RPCc30laLTK2yj zWrX018WOgP15AGcDsaTHRShmDhBhLLamOfp0nFNbqt3 X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypI+kqI5W6RXVXI+pVJRU9rmIguMJkeq1JhpyXAUitkZPz/h8vd1jh2l07soO7kApUzgvG4M5CZWlGXjC+Xvy8U= X-Received: by 2002:a7b:cf23:: with SMTP id m3mr2718331wmg.36.1587120606632; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 03:50:06 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2020 12:49:55 +0200 Message-ID: To: PHP Internals Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000f9752b05a37a4fab" Subject: Re: [RFC] Attributes v2 From: kontakt@beberlei.de (Benjamin Eberlei) --000000000000f9752b05a37a4fab Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" As there has only been minimal new discussion after the last changes to the RFC I wanted to give a heads up that I will open the vote on Monday afternoon. If you have further remarks or questions about the RFC, please let me know. On Mon, Mar 9, 2020 at 3:42 PM Benjamin Eberlei wrote: > Hi all, > > I want to resurrect Dmitrys Attributes RFC that was rejected for 7.1 in > 2016 with a few changes, incorporating feedback from the mailing list back > then and from talking to previous no voters. > > The RFC is at https://wiki.php.net/rfc/attributes_v2 > > A working patch is at https://github.com/beberlei/php-src/pull/2 though > work around the details is still necessary. > > The RFC contains a section with common criticism and objections to > attributes, and I hope to have collected and responded to a good amount > already from previous discussions. > > There is also a fair amount of implementation detail still up for debate, > which is noted in "Open Issues". I have pre-committed to one approach, but > listed alternatives there. On these issues I am looking for your feedback. > > greetings > Benjamin > --000000000000f9752b05a37a4fab--