Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:109616
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.80.23.2.2\))
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.21.2004140209290.3610@singlemalt.home.derickrethans.nl>
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2020 08:52:38 +0200
Cc: AllenJB <php.lists@allenjb.me.uk>,
 php internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID: <9ACF699A-56EB-4D57-A6C0-A56375B259F0@cschneid.com>
References: <1204349d-97ad-cf0f-93c9-4d18a424717e@allenjb.me.uk>
 <A1C81A64-5538-48E2-BCB1-7E088F7EC3E9@cschneid.com>
 <alpine.DEB.2.21.2004140209290.3610@singlemalt.home.derickrethans.nl>
To: Derick Rethans <derick@php.net>
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC][VOTE] Change default PDO error mode
From: cschneid@cschneid.com (Christian Schneider)

Am 14.04.2020 um 03:10 schrieb Derick Rethans <derick@php.net>:
> On Mon, 13 Apr 2020, Christian Schneider wrote:
>=20
>> Am 13.04.2020 um 14:41 schrieb AllenJB <php.lists@allenjb.me.uk>:
>>> As no concerns were raised during the discussion period, the RFC is =
unchanged from that originally posted.
>>>=20
>>> Previous discussion threads:
>>> * https://externals.io/message/109015
>>=20
>> For the record: I did raise concerns in
>> 	https://externals.io/message/109015#109144
>=20
> You did, but you never followed up on his questions:
> https://externals.io/message/109015#109178

I tried to keep the mail traffic down and I didn't think my concern =
would be discarded because of this.
But to answer the question

> Is this not just as disruptive to existing code as changing the =
default=20
> error handling to warnings?

First of all the RFC talks of changing the default error handling to =
*exceptions*, not warnings.
So yes, I think it should be changed to warnings first.
And for that: No, it is not as disrupting as it will write additional =
error messages to a log file vs. stopping the program execution.

- Chris