Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:109609
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAPyj-LDfdATXFD+dc5AY9EqWWxgf8LP1joD2fzvm==1gUoN35A@mail.gmail.com>
 <C3F55856-66AF-44F5-8F43-8E41FA8DC6E8@gmail.com> <CAPyj-LBt_Cq+qa49+H3Tav+uepSJ23+TPg_JN5DofGC7y8fnoQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <6aebe21d-2137-885e-5ee9-99d4f917a7f9@gmail.com> <CAPyj-LAo0tnG=tMJ_ir9SoaYKa1WM1AYCAiyfQ8Xkkx=W4usEw@mail.gmail.com>
 <5071DCCE-4572-4B1F-A50B-832C5EA74795@gmail.com> <CAPyj-LD87_6VcUNLtJbqQatUpBO1fTDb1f_ZgLyAp2fSjqYaLA@mail.gmail.com>
 <e801f32f-7f74-4d3e-4494-5242f213f101@gmail.com> <CAEsg9X1=u+ATO8h4nSxOyBstOgBwS1Lhv2bEC+pHv8gbD21A1w@mail.gmail.com>
 <c35a3d9b-2b6b-de64-aa27-762e7fb11f06@thelounge.net>
In-Reply-To: <c35a3d9b-2b6b-de64-aa27-762e7fb11f06@thelounge.net>
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2020 14:01:11 -0300
Message-ID: <CAEsg9X0dqNtGWzbr=Rdms7RjOrEF5pUm8Z_YKbii4NPsGU1Sfg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Reindl Harald <h.reindl@thelounge.net>
Cc: PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000063ea6405a32f0882"
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [DISCUSSION] Match expression
From: david.proweb@gmail.com (David Rodrigues)

--00000000000063ea6405a32f0882
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

But when we do:

function x() {
   $a =3D function () { return 123; }
}

We know that "return" here is for the current function () scope, and not
for the parents one. So "return" inside inlined-switch should be used to
specify the switch return itself. Seems clear to me.


Atenciosamente,
David Rodrigues


Em seg., 13 de abr. de 2020 =C3=A0s 12:32, Reindl Harald <h.reindl@theloung=
e.net>
escreveu:

>
>
> Am 13.04.20 um 17:08 schrieb David Rodrigues:
> > With all the humility of the world and without wanting to be exhaustive
> > about this, my only question is why can't we keep it as a switch, inste=
ad
> > of creating a new keyword?
> >
> > $x =3D switch ($y) {
> >     case 0: return 1;
> >     case 1: return 20;
> >     // default: return null;
> > };
>
> because when someone changes behavior where return is expected to return
> from a function/method someone could break his fingers?
>
> return means "stop function or include" and not "stop switch statement"
>

--00000000000063ea6405a32f0882--