Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:109608 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 35099 invoked from network); 13 Apr 2020 17:35:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 13 Apr 2020 17:35:01 -0000 Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBCBF180510 for ; Mon, 13 Apr 2020 09:04:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-ASN: AS1836 195.49.0.0/17 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from darkcity.gna.ch (darkcity.gna.ch [195.49.47.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Mon, 13 Apr 2020 09:04:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from flatter.home (unknown [IPv6:2a02:120b:c3f7:5090:48e5:1fc3:eecc:9a9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by darkcity.gna.ch (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4DCD76C11AF; Mon, 13 Apr 2020 18:04:24 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.80.23.2.2\)) In-Reply-To: <1204349d-97ad-cf0f-93c9-4d18a424717e@allenjb.me.uk> Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2020 18:04:23 +0200 Cc: internals@lists.php.net Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-ID: References: <1204349d-97ad-cf0f-93c9-4d18a424717e@allenjb.me.uk> To: AllenJB X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.23.2.2) Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC][VOTE] Change default PDO error mode From: cschneid@cschneid.com (Christian Schneider) Am 13.04.2020 um 14:41 schrieb AllenJB : > As no concerns were raised during the discussion period, the RFC is = unchanged from that originally posted. >=20 > Previous discussion threads: > * https://externals.io/message/109015 For the record: I did raise concerns in https://externals.io/message/109015#109144 and I still think that switching directly from silent mode to exceptions = and thus changing the control flow without prior warning is not the way = to go. That's why I voted no. Regards, - Chris