Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:109529 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 68793 invoked from network); 4 Apr 2020 15:23:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 4 Apr 2020 15:23:03 -0000 Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FAFD1804C5 for ; Sat, 4 Apr 2020 06:50:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-ASN: AS15169 209.85.128.0/17 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from mail-ua1-f43.google.com (mail-ua1-f43.google.com [209.85.222.43]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Sat, 4 Apr 2020 06:50:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ua1-f43.google.com with SMTP id a10so3818731uad.7 for ; Sat, 04 Apr 2020 06:50:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=basereality-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=DOG5e9MEhs8W5hbMgsgdTJtTM6xElxh+QXqMmmG8/jI=; b=ve4BLyu2Wh6GdOIRkByF2ZVRD8lzGB5+BIzGKnJNAv3XRXtlo7RYtdiJuSpDz3oq0z wevDbVifnDad2xPjvp0AQmhJkl7JD4IQkfwpx0WQeenhSCzRLzKOT0CerHbtf7lNocs7 EhWecarFd0VWXQ9B5Bu26NUucNojynXeIcIFJfsPN/Na54W5QwcUid1ya96WM1lyW3sj h1MIytvjLm/liAyWd6ggGh6kPegyXlniiIHhd5vau/ZDr7liJKev8gLiZYSwtLDrER8j ZhDuxZecCT7RbAlLYAeWw8qe0KvwPZySFm86LrPpqSJ+DYGsgf5xraZtZ2XwhplazbUL VBaQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=DOG5e9MEhs8W5hbMgsgdTJtTM6xElxh+QXqMmmG8/jI=; b=cL8f5gzPRSdfZ9Hboq1KkVE87z3ZeVDNEJZ13mWGC0EiXHhy9MmRfr2bqoIlh9WeI/ ozRaSkP2IqMlvSeZW2uKHBO/PjGV0bfymA4l1+3PzzH81WcxVR3jPphTTD/Z5SQGu6sL U2my6T2LHZ5ETtAzLj/PduVaAoxzcmelthTHos9X0haNw7jDEBnoUbdq4+u+2EOO/gcz NmTq+yeON/59SkQoT/vM9bzhXW1yu/E7D+3EcD6KQoCgwjbikYBVcFSMFwduRNlmZF+k 1RluupqMydCf6W3Qv3QshmveIVWG4RlI2gj84zwNuUDz0j11THgNNVLaOy+gbl3fHw1w ralw== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuaYJnU9q58VoxYS5zyKF16J/6reDH6Rsb1mvhMeAs4EMHPkkI0n DjYwte54VKkytMhYZNKDpV2mVN9718wu1iXYO807dw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypKf1A1gil20IPXsi1akeWmB5Kj5avXNx1A+R3CsVKaS1sBcMpc9PPi6T/t7K8LjEZcUY1BV65YM4MIQ80+5MSE= X-Received: by 2002:ab0:49e4:: with SMTP id f33mr9789123uad.86.1586008207206; Sat, 04 Apr 2020 06:50:07 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2020 14:49:56 +0100 Message-ID: To: Chase Peeler Cc: PHP internals Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Understanding RFC attitudes From: Danack@basereality.com (Dan Ackroyd) On Fri, 3 Apr 2020 at 17:46, Chase Peeler wrote: > If, instead, we lay it out as ... Thanks for useful feedback, I've added some words: "The aim of this guide is to make it easier to understand the arguments people are going to make either in favour or against the RFC. Hopefully this will make it easier to write RFCs that address people's concerns and so lead to more productive conversations. " And changed titles to: ## Things people will consider as reasons to vote against an RFC ## Things people will consider as reasons to vote for an RFC Also of course, pull requests will be considered. cheers Dan Ack