Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:109499 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 93189 invoked from network); 1 Apr 2020 18:40:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 1 Apr 2020 18:40:46 -0000 Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9514C1804F3 for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2020 10:07:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-ASN: AS15169 209.85.128.0/17 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from mail-lf1-f48.google.com (mail-lf1-f48.google.com [209.85.167.48]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2020 10:07:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lf1-f48.google.com with SMTP id e7so346331lfq.1 for ; Wed, 01 Apr 2020 10:07:13 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=SiHIINuFLxqX3m5WajpZEN+4MT3r6ppWkTsbL78UKyA=; b=XzwV21a2/pbrMMde8z8JtsplmUN234gOQCBqEu4XWbmcmHxGpeoeJi0hJwSF+NLVWS akvA4P0kTf0GjNPbS59/i5Ld2Ey7amaES3oHV72PR3p4paVZRIXnlvHPrXhq3gKHlrrO DputHKS7x+8bgb+ASI78r7QyvFj53tq57zpCxuPRfuAivcBAK3dMU9xBW8cGOxoTD7xG iTkspYyOf8G+tBgYyGRnPwM8vwPEtpkIHj37qf61haPJkeYE+vIGCWb4J6W6oAeGemsv Tx0eXR2jUKXd1v8442cLC6zCz9K4Bm2RlfqBsTeJCbQfNuKIL9MsVCIUM2xP6PwC0Ijf XL+Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuYEpX7ZNjfSNzzb0eGa8eP6gSlJ+uDr5mAzlyxenRSY/UXxfvcs ddlk2SRhwV+grQGqjsW/nB1ytUSFUq6JjYlLU/A= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypLEEuwMklfnRPQAdOiQO6vT9Y35F2jNDyYo9ptu0PQQJqYgHGsO0aqmYDi7z2S9rVKdoat/WF2oDf2vxdg4rcU= X-Received: by 2002:ac2:4a8a:: with SMTP id l10mr15330283lfp.17.1585760829328; Wed, 01 Apr 2020 10:07:09 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <5e84b4cd.1c69fb81.27249.d7f9SMTPIN_ADDED_MISSING@mx.google.com> In-Reply-To: <5e84b4cd.1c69fb81.27249.d7f9SMTPIN_ADDED_MISSING@mx.google.com> Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2020 12:06:54 -0500 Message-ID: To: Andrea Faulds Cc: php internals Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] Compact Object Property Assignment From: jakob@givoni.dk (Jakob Givoni) Hi Andrea, On Wed, Apr 1, 2020 at 10:35 AM Andrea Faulds wrote: > > Maybe it would be good to allow multiple-choice voting on why the RFC > was not voted for, and also to provide an option in the syntax vote for > not liking any of the syntax options, rather than just =E2=80=9CIrrelevan= t=E2=80=9D. Right. I considered multiple choice for the reason, but decided against it since I was afraid it would lead to everybody just ticket most of the reasons. I think I can glean more info when you're limited to the most important one= . As for not liking any of the syntaxes - just don't vote on that poll then. It seems to me it's pretty obvious it's not about the syntax anyway - nothing would please the people who find COPA useless and any syntax would be great for people who find it useful! Anything in between just feels like discussing tabs vs spaces again and again :-D I'm too old for that. best, Jakob