Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:109487
Return-Path: <tovilo.ilija@gmail.com>
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 86314 invoked from network); 31 Mar 2020 20:25:01 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5)
  by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 31 Mar 2020 20:25:01 -0000
Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C97A180543
	for <internals@lists.php.net>; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 11:51:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
X-Spam-ASN: AS15169 209.85.128.0/17
X-Spam-Virus: No
X-Envelope-From: <tovilo.ilija@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-yb1-f174.google.com (mail-yb1-f174.google.com [209.85.219.174])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
	 key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256)
	(No client certificate requested)
	by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS
	for <internals@lists.php.net>; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 11:51:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yb1-f174.google.com with SMTP id n2so10394275ybg.4
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 11:51:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
        h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
        bh=LNR4GuIWFFfT72sYYj3xcKhq5nNhgQrz7ld4VdZ4QDE=;
        b=KYlXJJ7aXssuqgIxxW+YkQdaPU7eD4i3hHwa2v52+jTBp2HMdVL40Nzcg5Q9vawKFK
         kvLdm6ZFhNX5yAGZnhSHMkGvbr+Qav0+wbs1S0su9SiVM8F9MoFhMBu3AEQ5s3sQhF+4
         jl7vD2xnHbc/cSYMW7nIWzCv8R/8BtjKKRRVYN4heeGVgrYd7b9i8xG2G1yMD2Rd05wj
         Bw4idgA+r24vD7ip5t5FOYWsu7RGyGwZCgD0Tpe34wRnQ8dKLo7mOnPIRwFrv3nDm4m8
         qK0tgv1EQdyJZ4qnZes6W6/iyIj5CdkH0M7vwEF9Uk3PoNl0WYiTqle+YzqsJov3QznI
         e7/Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
        bh=LNR4GuIWFFfT72sYYj3xcKhq5nNhgQrz7ld4VdZ4QDE=;
        b=B0xCLA7fmFCWbEjRlePfdn1N/kao/E7ItecUfGeeLpZFlc8krpf9cCFvY7fdNSln2l
         uTSEn+/nWacYxTI3YiellpiqECOhyObi1k2VC1gf2IjPyRHQpsoIR8WcI4M3sFxwIaaB
         dZAXzRjzZtYNjAysbyWOEMQ38M5lOKcfksbjcs5nygLbhkh7V14wYtQ0mKGaipFqVp2x
         k++Yd5NQJANYy9Lnjl2/I8SUZqzHukbkE7NfSTTKV6D8lf6LIHh6/SSG6uGOa91JjERg
         Yiku/u31rq/H5bwPqQ0sNM1hfwEExV/pfC2Hzxswc/nETgnna6UBRl2mVl1myYei/vM6
         3TNA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ3WGVTPclUeFIgns0mDCMArBD/78vf4mM57O/rubSTdc5kjvB5c
	SaWGmjk4tgqQPGxAGTxr74hSSIi7zBIvxE2obnxwHbEz
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vuvQS06qM6XMe+sVKxC/Qr0qB/Te4QLqzS0VYcBTUeYDiUBc6K6Acg6Iszl7dC+4Ar+RwuqTlf0t6gcYq/JcxA=
X-Received: by 2002:a25:8110:: with SMTP id o16mr31376203ybk.347.1585680670460;
 Tue, 31 Mar 2020 11:51:10 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 20:50:59 +0200
Message-ID: <CAPyj-LBfSHyF-_zxFX9UScrmKc2Jo2G-GUwQ24fTqqyzxEc+kQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Subject: [RFC][POLL] Switch expression
From: tovilo.ilija@gmail.com (Ilija Tovilo)

Hi internals

A few days ago I opened the discussion on the switch expression RFC:
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/switch_expression

There's been a fundamental disagreement on what the switch expression
should actually be. Due to the conflicting feedback I no longer know
how to proceed. This is why I've created a poll to get a general
feeling of what approach is preferred. If you can vote, **please**,
vote.

https://wiki.php.net/rfc/poll_switch_expression

Ilija