Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:109484 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 33989 invoked from network); 31 Mar 2020 15:41:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 31 Mar 2020 15:41:12 -0000 Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D1881801FD for ; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 07:07:23 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-ASN: AS15169 209.85.128.0/17 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from mail-qv1-f42.google.com (mail-qv1-f42.google.com [209.85.219.42]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 07:07:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-qv1-f42.google.com with SMTP id ca9so10874775qvb.9 for ; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 07:07:22 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=jbnTZhdjcusEfWQ/L+w8JGjl5FRBs6cOaLMchMO9Lco=; b=kt2Mrl9tOf0SO8lQ8jX68o3dvBTdyDRU7+gNIT+DAl7UEGavPYtzgilWwnjuj32C5H 6+NlPtoCp5B+FXxGqIMiyip8oiL53SbXQikgAYLM9hqBW6GQwm2Jv2QzuIhYdwPPu4Bz kZtDnokLibiBUgD1WE2Ott6xCKDFD5HsgiglxEmT3A+6OA8izQbi719KJQuHXgZL4wMa RYkotIrJcoT9RmGqraE5o5tIhIORsrnkLrRbtaKRDmIWCysk6VjFf8GoF0dglY1NZCEx yqmcJ6DdU4EwxVmjrRP5z3yam/2CPFW1JXt8WZ4/uBfL2IHNnulQR30u0VdIYTkV+pHs ru9g== X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ2kCjRYIhUQ1GTvqff4ol0ElYEASvyKSLJ309iSHfUxg3PhP/V+ pzoBlkWI4gFb8d+aLdrtsC7q9Buxv/9Ov3F+dobj1Cy0 X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vuCeEcRQbtXmyo90oUaG4oxWTzPSWdfqIbOdeBIWKoer5OsbLfN+mW5LBWd+tKyfJo217qIcns0xnp8redB7Gs= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:70e:: with SMTP id b14mr16300663qvz.246.1585663639933; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 07:07:19 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 09:07:09 -0500 Message-ID: To: Jakob Givoni Cc: php internals Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000fdee0e05a2271541" Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] Compact Object Property Assignment From: pollita@php.net (Sara Golemon) --000000000000fdee0e05a2271541 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 6:49 AM Jakob Givoni wrote: > I've moved the RFC to the voting phase: > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/compact-object-property-assignment > > On the third vote (which syntax would be better), I didn't vote because my answer is "None of the above". They're all kind of awful. I'm not against the concept of COPA, but every option on there makes me search for the "Nope" button, and I lack the imagination to suggest anything better. -Sara --000000000000fdee0e05a2271541--