Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:109481 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 11118 invoked from network); 31 Mar 2020 13:18:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 31 Mar 2020 13:18:44 -0000 Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE3261801FD for ; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 04:44:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-ASN: AS36483 23.83.208.0/21 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from buffalo.birch.relay.mailchannels.net (buffalo.birch.relay.mailchannels.net [23.83.209.24]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 04:44:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Sender-Id: s0seqk11zu|x-authuser|lester@lsces.uk Received: from relay.mailchannels.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FC2C32149A for ; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 11:44:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from cp9.ukdns.biz (100-96-7-10.trex.outbound.svc.cluster.local [100.96.7.10]) (Authenticated sender: s0seqk11zu) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 04B2A32153F for ; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 11:44:49 +0000 (UTC) X-Sender-Id: s0seqk11zu|x-authuser|lester@lsces.uk Received: from cp9.ukdns.biz (cp9.ukdns.biz [95.215.224.60]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384) by 0.0.0.0:2500 (trex/5.18.6); Tue, 31 Mar 2020 11:44:51 +0000 X-MC-Relay: Neutral X-MailChannels-SenderId: s0seqk11zu|x-authuser|lester@lsces.uk X-MailChannels-Auth-Id: s0seqk11zu X-Power-Daffy: 6eb962c62fcc0443_1585655090991_2135773807 X-MC-Loop-Signature: 1585655090991:3054110694 X-MC-Ingress-Time: 1585655090990 Received: from [81.157.80.37] (port=45844 helo=[192.168.1.133]) by cp9.ukdns.biz with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1jJFK0-002Tn4-K7 for internals@lists.php.net; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 12:44:44 +0100 To: internals@lists.php.net References: Message-ID: <4c36f5dd-2f43-3e00-0a6c-2566c3f9dd8c@lsces.uk> Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 12:44:44 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-thewebhostserver-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-thewebhostserver-MailScanner-ID: 1jJFK0-002Tn4-K7 X-thewebhostserver-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-thewebhostserver-MailScanner-SpamCheck: X-thewebhostserver-MailScanner-From: lester@lsces.uk X-AuthUser: lester@lsces.uk Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] [VOTE] Compact Object Property Assignment From: lester@lsces.uk (Lester Caine) On 31/03/2020 12:36, Jakob Givoni wrote: > I don't understand why people are replying to this email that has > [VOTE] in the subject as if it's still the discussion thread. > Please let me know if there's something I can do about it. The problem Jakob is that the new message is STILL attached to the original discussion. If you simply changed the 'DISCUSSION' to 'VOTE' then your email client still had the original message links in place. The whole email process is something of a mess, and the 'correct' way would have been to start with an empty message, add a clean subject and text and then send it to the list ... -- Lester Caine - G8HFL ----------------------------- Contact - https://lsces.uk/wiki/Contact L.S.Caine Electronic Services - https://lsces.uk Model Engineers Digital Workshop - https://medw.uk Rainbow Digital Media - https://rainbowdigitalmedia.uk