Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:109465 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 34466 invoked from network); 30 Mar 2020 19:10:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 30 Mar 2020 19:10:50 -0000 Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B955218050A for ; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 10:36:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-ASN: AS15169 209.85.128.0/17 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from mail-qt1-f174.google.com (mail-qt1-f174.google.com [209.85.160.174]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 10:36:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-qt1-f174.google.com with SMTP id z12so15836598qtq.5 for ; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 10:36:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=BSsVX6lyaB+23MBLnMpzFnoJLvk/Ob1v+WaeS18j04Q=; b=CVTh4ZfvtFnFuwpU15wz45ZKOZy0TbvwNhPYKwAoF3EGfU1adgOEdY3uEzVa3w7CH0 wN9hDL2SqCOTGJOUVwhgCEEfjicfHmWUKVZG4ovDYX4k9d3bGrt3vaFEV0fQrSD1vZhq MeeKQGDfF/qTeWE5gnNf9F/78kbTYPsSDHWoomV9G4aie9PLMw6gHrnmeoA01njsp/ia cta78lNzqerpqEbJaFBeiomJ53ehrQ+jbmMiTjPxngaMgSi9usavcNYdrScQlqGMouLe rMoB1eLSkJMzlKDI+cKR8H5cbU6eDpJ147H4EX10P4/Mma4tViiQ5xNOiaBjg/JXQvmb I9CQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ04DeOPvlX73A3EA7O6qCuWUghbsbRx+sN0MuUJnqJU37V4qux3 OepuVpse/y5bmjiKgT98D6Dn9fUbSn/Fb9mThTWz+V2n X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vsgIpTK6JUCVZHPm7EjDR04PN+qH9DVzPX+jaSK3xW21PHfvvIAFzb6T2JJlSTWVCjWg6tYO1EN0glcNIyyP1w= X-Received: by 2002:ac8:76c4:: with SMTP id q4mr1097023qtr.375.1585589808660; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 10:36:48 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2020 12:36:37 -0500 Message-ID: To: Sherif Ramadan Cc: Benjamin Morel , PHP Internals Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000004e1b3505a215e5e4" Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC][DISCUSSION] Change var_export() array syntax to use short hand arrays From: pollita@php.net (Sara Golemon) --0000000000004e1b3505a215e5e4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 12:32 PM Sherif Ramadan wrote: > Now, will you answer my question? >> > > Simple. > Wrong. It's complex as this thread proves. Opinions are not in alignment making it non-simple. > Because an implement in php-src is more available, > Wrong. It's got availability FOR THOSE ON THE LATEST VERSION. It is LESS available for those on older versions. > does not appear to have a lot of maintenance overhead, > Neither does brick/varexporter, this point is irrelevant. > is easy to implement > The format you want is already implemented. Done is easier than TODO. > and it's better in every way. > Wrong. Please consider reading my earlier reply. > Given that code is meant for human consumption > Wrong. It is meant for machine consumption. > I would say that conversely doing it IS a compelling reason. > > Wrong due to every part of your statement being wrong. All the best. -Sara > --0000000000004e1b3505a215e5e4--