Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:109451
Return-Path: <aliveandshocked@gmail.com>
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 81104 invoked from network); 30 Mar 2020 14:53:53 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5)
  by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 30 Mar 2020 14:53:53 -0000
Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB8091804B8
	for <internals@lists.php.net>; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 06:19:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
X-Spam-ASN: AS15169 209.85.128.0/17
X-Spam-Virus: No
X-Envelope-From: <aliveandshocked@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-lj1-f170.google.com (mail-lj1-f170.google.com [209.85.208.170])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
	 key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256)
	(No client certificate requested)
	by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS
	for <internals@lists.php.net>; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 06:19:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lj1-f170.google.com with SMTP id r7so10353601ljg.13
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 06:19:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
         :message-id:subject:to:cc;
        bh=NYJQ4NzvDpTr8s1EsfRYoEaQtd2wtIH5+J6/shUexSw=;
        b=Y5X6ygzfGGhoRiUUHQPdhCv+YwHSAnBb0jzcuuGoX/KT3U8HT3qv+px9a0Bt/AOAwq
         zaFRoeuopRitsokqJSz/cT/uhfmNlUzmylZ9S/ky4M6hv9MC4a0FmRjn/KohQhg/4//K
         ut5azejCZEtmdQ8ZKMXyqfRQB9He/qXmAsBFnrSRsKK+yB/h2M/ggXasylpdgguTlcKy
         TpxJD68v1nY5iT3X6af5zZpsZeSQ2WPh9zgz96KCafY+ScJTkp/SnewShXufPAMr+CEK
         FLYrKqjeIa4EYnAEW7MmrJ10/dxbYCQtpcqSaiUk0ZmmWQIAESNl9b1LcoSy7ZwMPyyq
         nBbg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuY5V0VTKRAADY3hiIV3v2DRyzlpi59Yy90OEcqbNikqdik4Cgfw
	wsuiK34LGg5BJwNz1XSoRL6NENJvmbK8BKwbZzU=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypIRCX6AW/ii3f/JUwFU3gHvuG0G7Z4BS4jCHTipvb/XIbTXJxgM08MVbMnAJLPq/9vJUr2oZyT2fJ5MndpdUkQ=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:651c:383:: with SMTP id e3mr6762582ljp.271.1585574383784;
 Mon, 30 Mar 2020 06:19:43 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAJmjfvW8b=jYTjLfW9N9FT_eQVS7RBe768NZXv-g4V2RM3OgtA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAJmjfvUcONYKvRKvAXB8x5n3faRwxntbg5q25Nan2aZrSNznXQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAAKU0unR5dX8nu4wQs1zaE0nRBMqB4MhfofF3PBvaxEEV98c2w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAAKU0unR5dX8nu4wQs1zaE0nRBMqB4MhfofF3PBvaxEEV98c2w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2020 08:19:33 -0500
Message-ID: <CAJmjfvX2Ly9MySOxPPtK7qP1-th8fT+xtDi-+=WGMCxV9TJNYg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Levi Morrison <levi.morrison@datadoghq.com>
Cc: php internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] [DISCUSSION] Compact Object Property Assignment
From: jakob@givoni.dk (Jakob Givoni)

Hi Levi,

On Sun, Mar 29, 2020 at 8:06 PM Levi Morrison
<levi.morrison@datadoghq.com> wrHote:
>
> The current RFC text is not consistent with using `=` or `=>` for the
> assignments. The assignment `=` is vastly more common, though, and I
> don't understand why if we are using an array syntax we aren't using
> `=>`.

Not sure what you mean - are you saying the RFC has internal inconsistencies?