Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:109442 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 85391 invoked from network); 30 Mar 2020 02:40:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 30 Mar 2020 02:40:30 -0000 Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B958B1804C3 for ; Sun, 29 Mar 2020 18:06:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-ASN: AS15169 209.85.128.0/17 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from mail-il1-f175.google.com (mail-il1-f175.google.com [209.85.166.175]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Sun, 29 Mar 2020 18:06:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-il1-f175.google.com with SMTP id r5so14220880ilq.6 for ; Sun, 29 Mar 2020 18:06:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=datadoghq.com; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=0rqkcc5GOMb8Xhpe5cUYZekuTdfbjOP8YEkYpqZwVzg=; b=HuxTHh7GqhYkkHmty6i8hxBbcm5N3Bsa5XUnobgSJJ8Lu3z+9pI8H8uD+Sh2Ogigc5 54tBlhjjNfsKEtqVdyhVo9WTO/5TzLl/P8JbHdy9vMLaFStEK7Pil5c0Z/GOlX3isIG2 YVa/zO9ztJAfY7tKG0DwIU5Yvd9O1DD4zzQ0w= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=0rqkcc5GOMb8Xhpe5cUYZekuTdfbjOP8YEkYpqZwVzg=; b=WlUN/IwtaNEhu5LmEoepKZSAMRwlUM3YDRQGCisLmjOh/cDOw0hgM6XmT04iov7iQr pTQWeDvRZy6mqaJvLXq3p7WWGdbrJECJ6FobSUGfsCNV2rC0om7TkNVvw4sflUHwJRAn 4/PmyRWWrNSnfPq631Sr4hNE4bTv8hqCUdkXHv52vhiWfdRVMx+kGwxAfVs34qr4eDxm nw/4+IZswSKZN9LuPJTCKyVEh2he/UA4+HnTvcO2bkkFCs5cP8q+5H+f4U16wLa+HbEH QgFQhochgPR7ulHyMkWotHd3YjFYozNexVO9+EPrT+0HOW/yQwVbg4E2Uaief/904Hhf WBrw== X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ3O0fqkMGKd2YX9ZU62Ro/0VbVx+OUn6iQ01YSMY7X83duwDZeO J1ldQfJqBknjaUuXE54fVfV4DOm+gNxwcp3nfBh4a0qb X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vtHb//NNTNCebwsFSO37j3aDMLWSxJ0otGNf2LALDyeXz0mRMQfaTSZE7PwYhsH+ZtXUt2hKVnV9ddoLS0jaRw= X-Received: by 2002:a92:912:: with SMTP id y18mr9205080ilg.234.1585530375069; Sun, 29 Mar 2020 18:06:15 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: Reply-To: Levi Morrison Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2020 19:06:03 -0600 Message-ID: To: Jakob Givoni Cc: php internals Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] [DISCUSSION] Compact Object Property Assignment From: internals@lists.php.net ("Levi Morrison via internals") The current RFC text is not consistent with using `=` or `=>` for the assignments. The assignment `=` is vastly more common, though, and I don't understand why if we are using an array syntax we aren't using `=>`. I intend to vote no. I agree that we need to do something in this space, but this is not it. I don't want perfect to be the enemy of good either, but I think this still needs more work. Maybe interested parties (including me) can collaborate off-list somewhere?