Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:109426 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 78029 invoked from network); 29 Mar 2020 22:38:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 29 Mar 2020 22:38:37 -0000 Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20D001804E2 for ; Sun, 29 Mar 2020 14:04:23 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-ASN: AS15169 209.85.128.0/17 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from mail-yb1-f178.google.com (mail-yb1-f178.google.com [209.85.219.178]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Sun, 29 Mar 2020 14:04:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-yb1-f178.google.com with SMTP id l84so7925780ybb.1 for ; Sun, 29 Mar 2020 14:04:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=ScO6u/k6tvohL8NhZmTaIGgpbEWmGuBvcF1zCGkauqY=; b=RMpbr2yXz65rWKmTdfopHgNc1bJ0/pgFIugsVphtk3IJUtXWwN7qV/Ko0O1TjipDEU WAoNOGajilJAljnNTp1pAshy8Xu+zjI9XQ6DNyb+ullg/nzwPXRjsFQrbgHRBKoaMaj9 64LxiCprBoT+xQseMggiCUsLZoV2bJYgdoovq33evkcOMd3KA+SI7LTn5rwxzbQ3q1Zx hL8u0kck8y3nPeBAtSe+82HPdQdxUG30LuBX0hZA3gQQK9CfEHKy9rsVE7XmDanEs4Qi pU1fYfOnnHOqsdQUO1jGQVsEWRjzgFmxfrLhQR9LnAsJJKyP5XiX9Krpdz4MaOgoTspg PSJg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=ScO6u/k6tvohL8NhZmTaIGgpbEWmGuBvcF1zCGkauqY=; b=pKJ4tupDmyHpgZTHVDCVy8cesQaT0YOXGNJoc+oBB6zVKAKTBkMaczu2PG/h063rqJ 5UjiPKJ8LrKS8xSp98FXd8h7bqHH33m0bjyOPvzh8DCJoNyiKc8ViLGpngGc0Pj8wyn+ 1fJV3pFzB9+ShhN0lwzt14SPhUAc/rn8EHuQ75dpiInrHb6/pTk5MLKbEF1sYQSSn9GJ POAJ9X+5Sgi+GcfAjeh1/K9CEVmQajF2ZeUhYwiayiMfxtR4FPUIZ++F9RguUt1tNHFC uKxulEfyOTPHQHmzXGPmdEaG5UX8AGNzXfAXDg/eRVcEu6/ug4haXu8R3aKdeIdZttNR SqKA== X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ0df3pOvEOyaR51dDwKgkdHQ+wMxfsIlSgvzpz0tt5gsDWuDiib H603NiS+/KmpL++AaOF/Dy/K2RtItFhwkdHvXHr8XHB5 X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vsLQjGB89gHEy0hW2KSfBsblzQyBSYFGkI0p1ATH+y3G5ZbPd9InZHcS8Xn93Fa/yqy0ALkQNIa0kWvrAdpafY= X-Received: by 2002:a25:d411:: with SMTP id m17mr13712207ybf.2.1585515859720; Sun, 29 Mar 2020 14:04:19 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <047092C7-84FB-42AB-8084-7B83F76F55C1@me.com> <026AF97E-ED0C-411C-8942-7DA7CC9705DB@me.com> <34ce624e-7d00-4f63-2c4f-da125deb65b8@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <34ce624e-7d00-4f63-2c4f-da125deb65b8@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2020 23:04:08 +0200 Message-ID: To: PHP internals Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] switch expression From: tovilo.ilija@gmail.com (Ilija Tovilo) > Having two syntaxes for one keyword is not a good idea, We're already doing that. What about classes vs anonymous objects? Functions vs closures? They're using the same keywords. There's no confusion. Ilija