Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:109405 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 95564 invoked from network); 28 Mar 2020 23:12:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 28 Mar 2020 23:12:00 -0000 Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 441B81804B8 for ; Sat, 28 Mar 2020 14:37:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-ASN: AS15169 209.85.128.0/17 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from mail-lj1-f177.google.com (mail-lj1-f177.google.com [209.85.208.177]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Sat, 28 Mar 2020 14:37:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lj1-f177.google.com with SMTP id i20so13898954ljn.6 for ; Sat, 28 Mar 2020 14:37:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=Wynr2MR3kkJnf6LZnx6OihsuRLNEgLV6TSr3fVsGHFU=; b=o0fSOrq/EEB1Lj3lw3U6f8Bp9Py7VZ1b3XX/77Ddo/J/Zvy3WGZ8nIk+cSpY5woemV bZxE/xoTVJLsUj0SxVLiGG8CCo1zJ7GxaKh980mS35qXOYFJSMhkAyGHC1vkTg7pRuj/ lI6ZnvZ0xQ2RThOuHv5dtJY4YbmetUmGhyCy0aNBlM1VjVT5UMoDt0DcbadS3LLKLTKT bvKpKjrx+0X/tUTY88D52lMX75pwcvt5ST/GTM97mScZrO/MWRdoWjcAoHLe3vUCl1uu DsXEUPPaxIgK82W+VkLbVYLFXCOu3M0ZgF8fTuEjhTdu8TkBukLYMwqGJcXluzTndsmJ etmQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuZtAX9Xwz9VWSU6oly9wGX73Laprh/kMLuXLgxNyOyizoT1Cett DwtYihQc6UP7qaWGfrB24pcBHD8ZRFyryw1QdnwVrA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypJbPSFXs5Jl4t0YInUG71fMOzTmTksAazl+s9BZtmYmtMwYffTZ54jy9m98FFYwtHSMyj0IHYmmEKdwQ4JHivs= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:8084:: with SMTP id i4mr3082873ljg.185.1585431445639; Sat, 28 Mar 2020 14:37:25 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2020 16:37:15 -0500 Message-ID: To: php internals Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] [DISCUSSION] Compact Object Property Assignment From: jakob@givoni.dk (Jakob Givoni) On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 6:48 AM Jakob Givoni wrote: > > Hello Internals, > > I'm opening up my new RFC for discussion: > > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/compact-object-property-assignment > - A pragmatic approach to object literals > > Let me know what you think! > > Best, > Jakob Hi again, Since the two weeks mandatory discussion period is nearing its end and there hasn't been any discussion activity for almost a week I'm planning on opening the vote for COPA on Monday. The RFC has been streamlined and updated to reflect all the discussion points raised, - a couple of them are now in the Rejected Features section and only the syntax question is still in the Open Issues section. I haven't received any feedback on my proposed alternative syntaxes so I guess we'll just put it to a vote (though I'm kind of sad that nobody with solid internals experience has commented on the implementability of any of them). It's my first RFC, I know its a tough sell and I'm not expecting to be successful the first time - I respect the vote 100%! I really believe that COPA can help thousands of PHP developers without introducing any new complexities to the language and my hope is that perfect won't be the enemy of good this time around :-) Any last words unsaid before the final lap commences? Best regards, Jakob