Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:109371
Return-Path: <gadelat@gmail.com>
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 39258 invoked from network); 27 Mar 2020 14:28:53 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5)
  by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 27 Mar 2020 14:28:53 -0000
Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DF171801FD
	for <internals@lists.php.net>; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 05:54:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
X-Spam-ASN: AS15169 209.85.128.0/17
X-Spam-Virus: No
X-Envelope-From: <gadelat@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-lj1-f169.google.com (mail-lj1-f169.google.com [209.85.208.169])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
	 key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256)
	(No client certificate requested)
	by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS
	for <internals@lists.php.net>; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 05:53:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lj1-f169.google.com with SMTP id w1so10047942ljh.5
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 05:53:59 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
        h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to
         :cc;
        bh=ntg8xeDPmUUitGdiug94/06b3yFv5a50L8ln7uPGeL4=;
        b=LwcWYE1EBKyCRptsYuDsRV/fSZS+IMW1EeqhDcqwMJhH4rDqhGltoha7aGdf0pID15
         5h9pK3MjELqpZ3Tcy5Ebj8B7ewLpeptQHI6bUNU4/er7AQPa/pGRdNSGbjEOAQTNWZAB
         vWZICI3mo7rhR6ldTLTIiHo1QOHa6xSpVAJi0Uafx2JBpLX2Pmjp7/LIulCpYqYKRujQ
         PZysFJzVNJuvhRmo4CGuLTz18ymwZGnHpmODQ4ykEaR3JYJAO6JD2FMi+B+JRZbv0D+R
         yIeO7AvIXzBp5Dat86xssHXlm0Y6sWkdnAPmGimzaAG9SK6V80CC9KYFTZupvN7ElkwX
         RkvA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
         :message-id:subject:to:cc;
        bh=ntg8xeDPmUUitGdiug94/06b3yFv5a50L8ln7uPGeL4=;
        b=gQ2sxcSKauClZQbSqF85pjJS7XBdLPrMWF3bKemJnMh8zJ0jWAweh4Vp4ZcQgSFCBo
         poQMSJDeXHhiy1Pp5/ymg1pRR4ZeBZGbn3RqLhHpAunI68giYpuiqwhqQEnbuCKWHq8o
         n46j3Vzg7BEhu1LXPFZb3NUFWHxnWyLI6k3P7R515XplhKOJFq982f/gaRJdkHlfkbvk
         k/yJcTTnJJsjWXtIok/mPaf2hTfZv6fLvSIQjyKN6lX+A5oFw69KmeSgibcD6Qs05VwT
         U0x7WxP1dgshzRcvS2saT8AL3qODpsqZEBiUAhEgta3AoZOX5Zj5LJoK7vB2/Vhc7mvp
         /S5g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuaYI+nM2dEApTwL5rYgYHJPb72IhauOUkdpXhIaL+dvtjOGGldS
	XU3fdL4kL+Eonv8IfE5snZZ+fFBshQPteciLMy0=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vvq86dtJbqgqK3SIKWWpMMPo8V+zNVsluuYTmd4lXFmFlTj4j9kmjqm9mBaeXNK7QYMnCeygDsWe+V2ZZFbHVQ=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:8496:: with SMTP id b22mr8432902ljh.235.1585313636290;
 Fri, 27 Mar 2020 05:53:56 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <047092C7-84FB-42AB-8084-7B83F76F55C1@me.com>
In-Reply-To: <047092C7-84FB-42AB-8084-7B83F76F55C1@me.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2020 13:53:45 +0100
Message-ID: <CAO11TfFk+OT6uC0vk2B9Y_W+w9uh33NPUcO8gD6sLJB=2qd5zw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ilija Tovilo <ilija.tovilo@me.com>
Cc: PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000026147a05a1d598ac"
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] switch expression
From: gabriel.ostrolucky@gmail.com (Gabriel O)

--00000000000026147a05a1d598ac
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

This doesn't look like it can do fallbacks which are traditional feature of
switch statements, can it? What I mean is this
```

case foo:
case bar:
  return 1;
case baz:
  return 2;
```

If we can't do that, I would suggest to go with different name, rather
than reusing "switch".

--00000000000026147a05a1d598ac--