Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:109264 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 4558 invoked from network); 24 Mar 2020 11:42:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 24 Mar 2020 11:42:34 -0000 Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE7241801FD for ; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 03:06:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NEUTRAL autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-ASN: AS20694 188.94.24.0/21 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from scarlet.netpirates.net (scarlet.netpirates.net [188.94.27.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 03:06:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from p5de2c89c.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([93.226.200.156] helo=[192.168.178.42]) by scarlet.netpirates.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92.3) (envelope-from ) id 1jGgSV-00058s-DH for internals@lists.php.net; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 11:06:55 +0100 To: internals@lists.php.net References: <003701d6013c$9afe9750$d0fbc5f0$@gmx.de> Reply-To: internals@lists.php.net Message-ID: <29a1827f-4862-4744-efbb-9e5b2ac4e407@php.net> Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 11:06:52 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] Userspace operator overloading From: sebastian@php.net (Sebastian Bergmann) Am 24.03.2020 um 11:03 schrieb Marco Pivetta: > Just posting here why I voted "no": it is not your implementation proposal, > but rather the concept per-se that IMO shouldn't land in the language. I voted "no" for the same reason.