Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:109205
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <5BEF8264-4003-4056-A31C-FF8BEE85FED6@me.com>
In-Reply-To: <5BEF8264-4003-4056-A31C-FF8BEE85FED6@me.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2020 17:16:19 +0000
Message-ID: <CA+kxMuREXT60g3UyNbXT=pfMFVcoWO+rco5Exft2Pj-vB_30Bw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ilija Tovilo <ilija.tovilo@me.com>
Cc: PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC][DISCUSSION] throw expression
From: Danack@basereality.com (Dan Ackroyd)

On Sun, 22 Mar 2020 at 16:17, Ilija Tovilo <ilija.tovilo@me.com> wrote:
>
> Due to the modest feedback I=E2=80=99d like to move the throw expression =
RFC to =E2=80=9Cunder discussion=E2=80=9D.
>
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/throw_expression
>

Regarding the example:

$condition || throw new Exception('$condition must be truthy')
  && $condition2 || throw new Exception('$condition2 must be truthy');

The "Deprecate left-associative ternary operator"* RFC made it so that
parentheses are required when ternary operators are nested in
complicated statements.

Would a similar requirement for parentheses around complicated throw
expressions be a suitable solution to avoid people being surprised by
the behaviour?

cheers
Dan
Ack

* https://wiki.php.net/rfc/ternary_associativity