Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:109165 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 15758 invoked from network); 20 Mar 2020 16:39:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.localdomain) (76.75.200.58) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 20 Mar 2020 16:39:53 -0000 To: internals@lists.php.net References: Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2020 15:03:20 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Posted-By: 87.81.129.66 Subject: Re: An incubation period for RFCs? [repost as own thread] From: marandall@php.net (Mark Randall) Message-ID: On 20/03/2020 14:38, Andrea Faulds wrote: > How does the list feel about this idea? From what I have read, userland testing of even RC versions seems to be as infrequent as to practically be non-existent outside the major frameworks, having a usable number of people playing about with it when it's not even in for certain seems unrealistic? Would it not also lead us to a situation where at any given time this incubation branch, or god forbid master, could be in any of 2^n different states depending on which engine features were available or not? That's a lot of extra uncertainty and possible unexpected interactions. Mark Randall