Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:109134
Return-Path: <levi.morrison@datadoghq.com>
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 23816 invoked from network); 19 Mar 2020 05:24:02 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5)
  by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 19 Mar 2020 05:24:02 -0000
Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 668181804DF
	for <internals@lists.php.net>; Wed, 18 Mar 2020 20:47:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,
	SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
X-Spam-ASN: AS15169 209.85.128.0/17
X-Spam-Virus: No
X-Envelope-From: <levi.morrison@datadoghq.com>
Received: from mail-il1-f170.google.com (mail-il1-f170.google.com [209.85.166.170])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
	 key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256)
	(No client certificate requested)
	by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS
	for <internals@lists.php.net>; Wed, 18 Mar 2020 20:47:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-il1-f170.google.com with SMTP id a6so955649ilc.4
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Wed, 18 Mar 2020 20:47:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=datadoghq.com; s=google;
        h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to
         :cc;
        bh=YG8+JmYzIkymCgtV9uXuCp9+Q0lykEx/6Qb0kXUHX7k=;
        b=bahQK5Ktvon9kk+HhszOvVOt8fLt8aJtC+a11/yUveQU5haZ9zJR9zk3y3mbF6oPDR
         +0A6fLgkgcKNH2D4FTPTKiECrOjAMB58ptS4lL82LpmXjf2XKH+8T+clnF+PKQvHpQUf
         zBD1puhO42xw5CtXqrWl6trh2yDzq053hpe2s=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
         :message-id:subject:to:cc;
        bh=YG8+JmYzIkymCgtV9uXuCp9+Q0lykEx/6Qb0kXUHX7k=;
        b=nKo16HijbnG0wv18pKSOH+M2MM8se2orZUh+98hWVQojfTIqesvc39B8K6/NnlRb1b
         u+Yf95ZqTPKJkPErNCMYuBXsRscjLXAJGiCfYvidNKxjWtmh7Lmbg56P7EptWt4g0Zu6
         YJhe+Y5qdzUISYnZK1tukSOyBPjM3l7UzPoJUuzob5+JZLhBrYqS3gkgVTS4RllhnsqH
         6Im7ibE33lS2rnlxtUq5XJ9kQAt3Vq0eLKiX2cKIszguizL06D+2hq0irEUyjzEv50pE
         fQgrHUqEpJApXqgUclfgRePuWTnlDAYbDzyCNQ/AUhFQABtn2s80480tLm5iKunvsvFg
         Ui1Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ0L72QbfWq1Ga0agFoNyDGfYjSK2zja6CCogh2TMxN/ObXBlGqo
	/2yYT7cA7EnXDHU0EtrY+hybqp14f58gQd29LDngAA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vs0Nxq7N2G4RhFZr5Mc139irUyslCRlR9CWKGsyBfxyx0k5qolpvQHvg38mypsqPqRwjCpJiL1dZFy0Z9R6m+8=
X-Received: by 2002:a92:d641:: with SMTP id x1mr1372064ilp.223.1584589624907;
 Wed, 18 Mar 2020 20:47:04 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <14383D05-EA33-4CD2-9648-40AA29A837A5@newclarity.net>
 <CAJW__o020OgyHEixHUCtgRijhx92OA1vzuKHAF8hRTcAxo1mRg@mail.gmail.com> <5e72b9a7.1c69fb81.7d447.f4f1SMTPIN_ADDED_MISSING@mx.google.com>
In-Reply-To: <5e72b9a7.1c69fb81.7d447.f4f1SMTPIN_ADDED_MISSING@mx.google.com>
Reply-To: Levi Morrison <levi.morrison@datadoghq.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2020 21:46:54 -0600
Message-ID: <CAAKU0u=548NGynGnLbQO6N84g2NSiLq1zK7X6MF-QwByzqtf=g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mark Randall <marandall@php.net>
Cc: PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Capturing reasons for votes for historical sake?
From: internals@lists.php.net ("Levi Morrison via internals")

It is my opinion that voting "no" should not require any more effort
than voting "yes". Voting "no" is just as reasonable as voting "yes".
We do not need to justify our opinion.

The burden of documenting the historical reasons for "no" should be
placed on the RFC authors, not the voters.