Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:109133 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 14933 invoked from network); 19 Mar 2020 04:21:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 19 Mar 2020 04:21:29 -0000 Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 399EC1804DF for ; Wed, 18 Mar 2020 19:44:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-ASN: AS15169 209.85.128.0/17 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from mail-lj1-f170.google.com (mail-lj1-f170.google.com [209.85.208.170]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Wed, 18 Mar 2020 19:44:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lj1-f170.google.com with SMTP id y17so673225ljk.12 for ; Wed, 18 Mar 2020 19:44:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=kkFyBy7r1mE4nRJoDYl8WN5YoMZPfpZ7YcPOs7laZVo=; b=K11NRc8oMoWBO/j4j68+2AFKLx0Qn10lxQ4JDRFUZ5CEcKjTRcyRyStz8UWRt7dDyn tJJUyFTjJsYDUsbGQokxoQ48F4GaM5g9mi5qG82s+XnVgiRhhHsdj0zzcMJ9YEft6Ymi gShKnUM2SigmE+FXqKB9H7dvi4UaLSA8F/j2shGLW3HNqtlIVR9IUv4j8XHwJeC5Oo8U LhHyQbtwXFwpL8VzhSI4VCHUTo/SlzSrP63SG0BPq/6OuLo0FN/pkklQSLDmsxLO5Je8 87nZaW+3AYoEmWeXkAoRz/2hRTw/cSsV00UeU9ZqVTOb42FXjCQG1AtHDpQSb8PAul1y l/fg== X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ18VwGm0H4ZILDOnp7PDdtf8RHfYZ2mR67E99SyWP5iNDTpsf7y x31wOh4UM8ga8w09WYPBMMINu8B2M2HkFXyo2lGalA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vtmOfEdmTtw1Wp3hotGsM52qeDlJzlkrZij0y8C2vySf1Wk/XcwIARIT3XTUaHqVQXGq+4vEFVMXDaipq+U44U= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:854e:: with SMTP id u14mr644279ljj.27.1584585869124; Wed, 18 Mar 2020 19:44:29 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <14383D05-EA33-4CD2-9648-40AA29A837A5@newclarity.net> <5e72b99c.1c69fb81.ef7e4.fda5SMTPIN_ADDED_MISSING@mx.google.com> In-Reply-To: <5e72b99c.1c69fb81.ef7e4.fda5SMTPIN_ADDED_MISSING@mx.google.com> Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2020 21:44:18 -0500 Message-ID: To: Mark Randall Cc: php internals Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Capturing reasons for votes for historical sake? From: jakob@givoni.dk (Jakob Givoni) On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 7:15 PM Mark Randall wrote: > Well, they shouldn't be casting a vote in the first place. Hear! Hear! Ok, I don't mean to be harsh, but rather to demonstrate a way that you can express agreement with something someone else has said without repeating it. Maybe if more voters participated in discussions in this simple way, asking for voting reasons post hoc would not come up time and time again... Or to vary it: - Ditto - I agree - True - What (s)he said