Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:109130
To: Mike Schinkel <mike@newclarity.net>
Cc: Nikita Popov <nikita.ppv@gmail.com>, Jakob Givoni <jakob@givoni.dk>,
 PHP Internals <internals@lists.php.net>
References: <14383D05-EA33-4CD2-9648-40AA29A837A5@newclarity.net>
 <CAJmjfvX+p975Wbi6uKO5a1MGS-S-JL6j6yBhK_VjaMEZbfyBnQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAF+90c_vgs638ut08YbitjHo9DukvYpjNfw+NNA+=prHf5wsXw@mail.gmail.com>
 <70d0e790-56b3-0544-cc22-3b4c40a29631@gmx.de>
 <69343F6E-6A1B-4EE9-B2DB-9735AA18D650@newclarity.net>
Message-ID: <eadfd4ca-c5c8-e3b5-b179-2d83e2e4880f@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2020 22:52:51 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/68.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <69343F6E-6A1B-4EE9-B2DB-9735AA18D650@newclarity.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: de-DE
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Capturing reasons for votes for historical sake?
From: cmbecker69@gmx.de ("Christoph M. Becker")

On 17.03.2020 at 20:33, Mike Schinkel wrote:

>> On Mar 17, 2020, at 4:44 AM, Christoph M. Becker <cmbecker69@gmx.de> wr=
ote:
>>
>> On 17.03.2020 at 09:26, Nikita Popov wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 8:09 PM Jakob Givoni <jakob@givoni.dk> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 1:29 PM Mike Schinkel <mike@newclarity.net> w=
rote:
>>>>> If we had that we could list the reasons and the number of votes tha=
t
>>>> choose those reasons on the RFC for historical purposes.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks Mike, exactly what I was thinking when I started writing RFC:
>>>> COPA (https://wiki.php.net/rfc/compact-object-property-assignment)!
>>>>
>>>> As you can see in my "Voting" section, I had the idea to capture
>>>> reasons for no-votes, to document it in the outcome of the RFC, shoul=
d
>>>> it fail.
>>>> It would have saved my research quite a bit if I had had the no-vote
>>>> reasons for the RFCs I reference at the bottom.
>>>>
>>>> +1 on the idea from me!
>>>>
>>>
>>> FWIW this has been discussed a few times already, and I believe the
>>> consensus is: We're happy to have *optional* reasons for votes, if som=
eone
>>> actually implements it.
>>>
>>> For the number of times someone has brought this up on list, there has=
 been
>>> a distinct lack of volunteers for actually making it happen ;)
>>
>> If anybody wants to take a stab at this, patching the doodle plugin[1]
>> would be the way to go.
>>
>> [1]
>> <https://github.com/php/web-wiki/tree/master/dokuwiki/lib/plugins/doodl=
e>
>
> Ah, I see.  So set up https://github.com/php/web-wiki locally and I'd ha=
ve what I need?

It might work to install a plain DokuWiki, and to put the repo contents
on top.  Otherwise, see
<https://github.com/php/web-wiki/blob/master/docs/README.CONFIGURE>.

=2D-
Christoph M. Becker