Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:109128 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 33026 invoked from network); 18 Mar 2020 17:42:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 18 Mar 2020 17:42:19 -0000 Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64FB21804F6 for ; Wed, 18 Mar 2020 09:05:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-ASN: AS29169 217.70.176.0/20 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (relay4-d.mail.gandi.net [217.70.183.196]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Wed, 18 Mar 2020 09:05:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: 107.223.28.39 Received: from samurai.attlocal.net (107-223-28-39.lightspeed.nsvltn.sbcglobal.net [107.223.28.39]) (Authenticated sender: pmjones@pmjones.io) by relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5BFF0E0015 for ; Wed, 18 Mar 2020 16:05:11 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.0 \(3608.60.0.2.5\)) Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2020 11:05:06 -0500 References: <50BD013E-CF72-414C-BBC0-A7A2E45CBDDB@pmjones.io> To: PHP Internals In-Reply-To: <50BD013E-CF72-414C-BBC0-A7A2E45CBDDB@pmjones.io> Message-ID: <09051131-A0F4-4575-B03F-F5A0539416A1@pmjones.io> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.60.0.2.5) Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] RFC: Server-Side Request and Response Objects (v2) From: pmjones@pmjones.io ("Paul M. Jones") Hi all, With the name change from `ServerRequest` to `SapiRequest` (et al.), = discussion appears to have waned again. I believe all relevant questions have been answered and recorded at this = point. Please review the updated RFC and implementation, and present any = more questions/comments/concerns you may have. Unless there are objections (or new substantive discussion) I plan to = open voting tomorrow or Friday.=20 Thanks to everyone who has participated so far! --=20 Paul M. Jones pmjones@pmjones.io http://paul-m-jones.com Modernizing Legacy Applications in PHP https://leanpub.com/mlaphp Solving the N+1 Problem in PHP https://leanpub.com/sn1php