Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:109111 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 39994 invoked from network); 17 Mar 2020 21:10:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 17 Mar 2020 21:10:50 -0000 Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AF421804C5 for ; Tue, 17 Mar 2020 12:33:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-ASN: AS15169 209.85.128.0/17 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from mail-qt1-f174.google.com (mail-qt1-f174.google.com [209.85.160.174]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Tue, 17 Mar 2020 12:33:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-qt1-f174.google.com with SMTP id e20so18591048qto.5 for ; Tue, 17 Mar 2020 12:33:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=newclarity-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=izf29vmFEKha0ewnXAiBEm6iFrsWlNP/P7fzW7VhF/U=; b=bLiArA+vJ7G5jImH2Sb9+fSqYf/MsLWXXpJs/wFjzWC1+MBUsTWrAQNtBb1o77XiML tWhc35YSifB2EcyLxm+5UGQ81pcZqq0LnbW2b/Jw0BMbjH6SuCkV/b5ZlytBf4or7FJb PDgDxb3cW9La2pkyiiJdG24IxdHAwcDus3Zl67XyyTrO8+vC9YKlkUOumQNbryhEZ2WP 5HFdNeQv86g1kkS6sSKV1b0lc8hDjf3eda97KLxsI6Ya7N0KoBf5uSirS06Ho7QOMavR TiA/Tn36dlEVjn0pAHNIT3TVM/MfYZNL6KAltPrFAXjjVZGzprCi5Sd3M58DR2rVPHOI HQiA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=izf29vmFEKha0ewnXAiBEm6iFrsWlNP/P7fzW7VhF/U=; b=WeEKsqbVrKITshWL5YxQcjFk822Z8dpaU4m7yUrVk9a2xoLoZ3oiWBIuFsiks2Plnk jcvdeEkxX9kWwIu9rV0hNwYAdywkkgJ7w9ZPKDy/w4+GGMWZH85CsxCdz2y2Buybh9+E HkNs/rYbZQqZ3XLh95jzz0AaGZO3ZNIw4+z2UDcS92owbSmfVe9ngJDAep335ONjuM7o VOSS3WTnH1MQIBIwI8A+3launH8lsrJAnY+DTMtZRW+mMu2s4f4Yqd3rOYkDkYUBQwlj oBj9rXR5dtqd+eNNozekAc0KVcBoBPBVPqtl6RLyYBqRwrurTuqRVfp/1f3c+LLbtLYl pReA== X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ1FBQCU/p0HUkNo94m8Px37NIZsvnZOqpm13QZ0+NhBIctnvdg0 KzbanTeBg5FpllPZTuVMNMUMTw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vsgkCV2pPfFcO56lEDVYX+CEqCVP2EBnlh2ilFFsgtli8rGXh+1kea05ihmH4VxH00BUxGMEQ== X-Received: by 2002:ac8:1198:: with SMTP id d24mr782043qtj.105.1584473613409; Tue, 17 Mar 2020 12:33:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.10] (c-24-131-44-78.hsd1.ga.comcast.net. [24.131.44.78]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m1sm3087385qtk.16.2020.03.17.12.33.32 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 17 Mar 2020 12:33:32 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\)) In-Reply-To: <70d0e790-56b3-0544-cc22-3b4c40a29631@gmx.de> Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2020 15:33:31 -0400 Cc: Nikita Popov , Jakob Givoni , PHP Internals Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-ID: <69343F6E-6A1B-4EE9-B2DB-9735AA18D650@newclarity.net> References: <14383D05-EA33-4CD2-9648-40AA29A837A5@newclarity.net> <70d0e790-56b3-0544-cc22-3b4c40a29631@gmx.de> To: "Christoph M. Becker" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11) Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Capturing reasons for votes for historical sake? From: mike@newclarity.net (Mike Schinkel) > On Mar 17, 2020, at 4:44 AM, Christoph M. Becker = wrote: >=20 > On 17.03.2020 at 09:26, Nikita Popov wrote: >=20 >> On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 8:09 PM Jakob Givoni wrote: >>=20 >>> On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 1:29 PM Mike Schinkel = wrote: >>>> If we had that we could list the reasons and the number of votes = that >>> choose those reasons on the RFC for historical purposes. >>>=20 >>> Thanks Mike, exactly what I was thinking when I started writing RFC: >>> COPA (https://wiki.php.net/rfc/compact-object-property-assignment)! >>>=20 >>> As you can see in my "Voting" section, I had the idea to capture >>> reasons for no-votes, to document it in the outcome of the RFC, = should >>> it fail. >>> It would have saved my research quite a bit if I had had the no-vote >>> reasons for the RFCs I reference at the bottom. >>>=20 >>> +1 on the idea from me! >>>=20 >>=20 >> FWIW this has been discussed a few times already, and I believe the >> consensus is: We're happy to have *optional* reasons for votes, if = someone >> actually implements it. >>=20 >> For the number of times someone has brought this up on list, there = has been >> a distinct lack of volunteers for actually making it happen ;) >=20 > If anybody wants to take a stab at this, patching the doodle plugin[1] > would be the way to go. >=20 > [1] > = Ah, I see. So set up https://github.com/php/web-wiki locally and I'd = have what I need? -Mike=