Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:109103 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 64148 invoked from network); 17 Mar 2020 14:49:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 17 Mar 2020 14:49:10 -0000 Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA0F31804B8 for ; Tue, 17 Mar 2020 06:11:50 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-ASN: AS29169 217.70.176.0/20 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from relay6-d.mail.gandi.net (relay6-d.mail.gandi.net [217.70.183.198]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Tue, 17 Mar 2020 06:11:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: 107.223.28.39 Received: from samurai.attlocal.net (107-223-28-39.lightspeed.nsvltn.sbcglobal.net [107.223.28.39]) (Authenticated sender: pmjones@pmjones.io) by relay6-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A4942C0004; Tue, 17 Mar 2020 13:11:47 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.0 \(3608.60.0.2.5\)) In-Reply-To: <14383D05-EA33-4CD2-9648-40AA29A837A5@newclarity.net> Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2020 08:11:43 -0500 Cc: PHP Internals Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-ID: <61BBEA2D-F215-4DD5-8753-DE7E1D5CC407@pmjones.io> References: <14383D05-EA33-4CD2-9648-40AA29A837A5@newclarity.net> To: Mike Schinkel X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.60.0.2.5) Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Capturing reasons for votes for historical sake? From: pmjones@pmjones.io ("Paul M. Jones") > On Mar 16, 2020, at 13:29, Mike Schinkel wrote: >=20 > Hi all, >=20 > It is a real shame that the PHP voting process has no way to capture a = concise description of why people voted against an RFC. ... > Would it be possible to add a feature when voting were people either = need to type in a one to two sentence reason why they voted "no" on a = proposal OR select from the reasons that others have already given when = voting down the specific RFC? =20 I would be against making it a *requirement* but I sure would be happy = to see it as an *option*. --=20 Paul M. Jones pmjones@pmjones.io http://paul-m-jones.com Modernizing Legacy Applications in PHP https://leanpub.com/mlaphp Solving the N+1 Problem in PHP https://leanpub.com/sn1php