Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:109091 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 1253 invoked from network); 17 Mar 2020 03:45:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 17 Mar 2020 03:45:19 -0000 Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 487E31804DF for ; Mon, 16 Mar 2020 19:07:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-ASN: AS15169 209.85.128.0/17 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from mail-lj1-f176.google.com (mail-lj1-f176.google.com [209.85.208.176]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Mon, 16 Mar 2020 19:07:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lj1-f176.google.com with SMTP id u12so21010917ljo.2 for ; Mon, 16 Mar 2020 19:07:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=MuA7rFVJWFuudrceT/a9o6T6dmEcnYQctjRMBVYmJKM=; b=IXbC+J7wjkB3OLQ54b27jbKK4e72hNi/FVb5s06KjBLcKl7ejTPkbM3xn0iFkqbrC7 09WAAVhOEvBDpTQEBpm+sfU7q6/6TQGKwyYvLFUcceGmXqQF6Jp1miADw8QJ5iyevHwM Iv7PQAVQ0UftI7SDArY0zwGofUgtrOyKHzwoiu1LZL+Scnlo1fDthmzjSU5M62N9vc+w igTod3uuzjlTKb8wiLVnJS1O4ij3pwa7Kp0Q6r6dKz0MA5m0at4jSG4gR9+3Gc4PBLas xgHvZPsJJC7ctoLuZj8F+hS2JFuO+64yH/2LY+9B4j/tL6fLeXbbvJfd2xa13XirOY7P O6Bw== X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ1Bq6XN5EsmJ38+8PP022qSDzX/sub6WQstrLk3brJXr7Vc4LDB saYu0jXkh+Rqm3KzzW3KKGELJCJkNuRs+njFXpGkzxsb X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vvu1A1rRzKSbvZvr+dq4Lin28Y4B9IjGtFy/9mE+UjH/MrLV8steyXmuWAsmKJJQUzHfQRg3aOmtkc4+QHP9Uk= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:854e:: with SMTP id u14mr1308859ljj.27.1584410869907; Mon, 16 Mar 2020 19:07:49 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2020 21:07:38 -0500 Message-ID: To: php internals Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] [DISCUSSION] Compact Object Property Assignment From: jakob@givoni.dk (Jakob Givoni) On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 6:48 AM Jakob Givoni wrote: > Let me know what you think! Thank you for your feedback so far! I'd be really curios to know what authors of the referenced RFCs think about this, f.ex. Micha=C5=82 (brzuchal@php.net), Andrey (andrewgrom@rambler.ru) and Nikita (nikic@php.net) Is simple inline object population useful in itself? Is the proposed implementation as trivial as I think it is? Best regards, Jakob