Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:109080 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 21541 invoked from network); 16 Mar 2020 20:46:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 16 Mar 2020 20:46:15 -0000 Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 112A21804C5 for ; Mon, 16 Mar 2020 12:08:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-ASN: AS15169 209.85.128.0/17 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from mail-lj1-f178.google.com (mail-lj1-f178.google.com [209.85.208.178]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Mon, 16 Mar 2020 12:08:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lj1-f178.google.com with SMTP id d23so19936670ljg.13 for ; Mon, 16 Mar 2020 12:08:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=JHKPCGETyM4EXqJbrPIrH5lyDb1Eqb1epa+y1f0EURw=; b=fx/GeWxJgVivM73Ley84ye3rhRAdn5xiWSuwMsclI8dp94D1q/aaSZCU5sVYgjv2/M wHPM7Vg/nwdFNI8BsQxFLjt5B1mnPd5xep37yJ49qtIJTXzy20wuGdjajrEsnzLpShBB WTxC0WJPnknzs/BYIZ/ppqWLVtYVVDQjR1wjeVSPmsd/zUdvCW18F0lGCexyk4bOp/4w DJnKsCL7vs7M2uRcQMFNqY7VCJDONczmLkplN5GcAeVC+RojH9XYkd5PZ2jKd9VF1kSa HGYMBSddv3+x3GSY+dVkMlhjcYkuLdEuKWgDYh3dG4tY5O8IGR0ucJVIoPr7uqzgHjXa AlCw== X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ21Da+DVXdjYP98EBzdSK4RqWZIFd5NLh2O2iXsKASE5NfukZRL 7BGiiPwEhhoz5o/FFdCUzwVP0GiZT8nyogvL19gakwtE X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vv/2spSxi/yUbYlU3vrfLWrK1ohRZyHcxKejfau/iGBDpUi2WaoJeG4a+BeIVrxWLxFQ2Boho9WPwGmbr6PKAI= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9ccb:: with SMTP id g11mr409977ljj.271.1584385719871; Mon, 16 Mar 2020 12:08:39 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <14383D05-EA33-4CD2-9648-40AA29A837A5@newclarity.net> In-Reply-To: <14383D05-EA33-4CD2-9648-40AA29A837A5@newclarity.net> Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2020 14:08:28 -0500 Message-ID: To: Mike Schinkel Cc: PHP Internals Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Capturing reasons for votes for historical sake? From: jakob@givoni.dk (Jakob Givoni) On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 1:29 PM Mike Schinkel wrote: > If we had that we could list the reasons and the number of votes that choose those reasons on the RFC for historical purposes. Thanks Mike, exactly what I was thinking when I started writing RFC: COPA (https://wiki.php.net/rfc/compact-object-property-assignment)! As you can see in my "Voting" section, I had the idea to capture reasons for no-votes, to document it in the outcome of the RFC, should it fail. It would have saved my research quite a bit if I had had the no-vote reasons for the RFCs I reference at the bottom. +1 on the idea from me!