Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:109024 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 75947 invoked from network); 14 Mar 2020 23:31:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 14 Mar 2020 23:31:03 -0000 Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19C031801FD for ; Sat, 14 Mar 2020 14:53:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-ASN: AS15169 209.85.128.0/17 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from mail-il1-f170.google.com (mail-il1-f170.google.com [209.85.166.170]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Sat, 14 Mar 2020 14:53:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-il1-f170.google.com with SMTP id l14so12620656ilj.8 for ; Sat, 14 Mar 2020 14:53:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=EtofxhAln+dN+GZJ2c9EfrIfVn7XjjJnjTlbyUX7jyE=; b=K5b6utThhLqC/kLyN0Q/3dlKUaaDHeQNX3yODea/ODBEO1ATkCc+pp69W4IZSx22+N wXuyhSpJ77DBTr3QVyGG7bu5SApT7ZQyatSAjvwg9/wkRibb3SVzu9VtVU84cawJnXUl /6r/Zo2I4fYw73XtlEhFe97Cn1YFfkfyrbxlT5SuwGzREJggd4zde0gvntG1qj2Uvvfj KyPS1pR4kOz6usfnSTveJK8gQTE4+IXshObT88J5zqxU0lQYZ1aJpEFSfwsz3FNnrhT8 A9VTR5Z8fiAWP18NGTpBclMRHSW4mad6r0v1icL/VTV//Bqkoe+N2AlexEfRTH00hYHT XmGQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=EtofxhAln+dN+GZJ2c9EfrIfVn7XjjJnjTlbyUX7jyE=; b=ZSByfylV1BX75eZjDvsCdPPq5aBKzrRtlVjBwSAmTd4sseU+fNmxoJsFvuUPSmTekj EMBUoBo3z2Xq5y6FzVMu6yeuahgEkBvdiaruYRRHs+yBK1HVwPLcbWAyGV2pdA7nvVY3 aYcQ4k5UX4wDrzl7lF9X+AjlNbS/bwHASrYzb4sQnmOn/MzTsk1SAsBu8UONTpBaxQwL QiDcrHj7uNnarbO2NqeYQsrKNfRLXPK7KH5M3Czbyt7btsnxxRVQQMMrlV92cYjYufQc w+DziKR9qeV1ZJTv7i1Cn+mp75z5yewxwhvwfkCTjYyT9b8lP+FJ5Pl9bMkzqtyhKdtE 5LCg== X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ1yxBln6g7WepJ6/GBwOFqIjgz3jv4iEn2lgOfNR7/LJzVUQqak +ZLOv96V5YbjRvcz+6Hhp7RA/F1zzeQ47LP+2eb7MXNEth4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vvHTm5OEh8/h42fhgw7bGCjGlQ0M0kx4Z1gnhEszF5rK7jxsINOQd/V4W5uAGOPAEfXJMs5Qiozq6bgX7drChg= X-Received: by 2002:a92:91d6:: with SMTP id e83mr21135818ill.165.1584222782499; Sat, 14 Mar 2020 14:53:02 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <8545d15e-ddd5-42be-8405-09697a077234@www.fastmail.com> <4d9688fe-cc57-44af-903e-05f4cbb1bbcc@www.fastmail.com> <6bcbf0a5-92d8-4cfa-a00f-e0e967fc037e@www.fastmail.com> <700327df-45d5-47ca-8828-d7ad9c9bee2e@www.fastmail.com> In-Reply-To: Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2020 22:52:50 +0100 Message-ID: To: =?UTF-8?B?TcOhdMOpIEtvY3Npcw==?= Cc: Larry Garfield , php internals Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000032329a05a0d79c1e" Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] [DISCUSSION] Immutable/final/readonly properties From: ocramius@gmail.com (Marco Pivetta) --00000000000032329a05a0d79c1e Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hey M=C3=A1t=C3=A9, Is the RFC still gonna allow default values (constants, at this point)? While I don't see a major problem with it, it seems a bit weird... On Sat, Mar 14, 2020, 12:00 M=C3=A1t=C3=A9 Kocsis = wrote: > Thank you, Larry, for your response! I share your opinion. However, I'd b= e > curious if there is anyone who doesn't? > > As things currently stand, I plan to start the vote on Monday with an > unchanged proposal (+ an extended future scope section). > > M=C3=A1t=C3=A9 > --00000000000032329a05a0d79c1e--