Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:109013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 79894 invoked from network); 14 Mar 2020 16:57:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 14 Mar 2020 16:57:05 -0000 Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B570F1804E2 for ; Sat, 14 Mar 2020 08:19:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-ASN: AS15169 209.85.128.0/17 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from mail-wm1-f49.google.com (mail-wm1-f49.google.com [209.85.128.49]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Sat, 14 Mar 2020 08:19:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wm1-f49.google.com with SMTP id 25so13012080wmk.3 for ; Sat, 14 Mar 2020 08:19:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=JRbLnUin36Rg4fWvwvlbnUhu6IY5yhPXmi1IS4LZ5YU=; b=PqQL/a+aLBgYZdqnrM7ET1XqAZUe5dH8Rq8CcI8LNSoIHwM7Mwc/O0Z3R/Eie4njmM 9mBxTDBaKn+jOvY+V56n80kvEUIWBIyknTbrLBGJA+KwvbPCPGxIQB6xkCBmiWFYc+nv bI+yhaNnx5KHl+FNB4nx/5Dsmol36O8I1W39QNYZBBt537xCM3mh9pY4WzXC3i/UYTbL gkgRQTIygSrfo7Morqm/I/UaJPAEjph1uQEW7dowhqFLxRIlfA+Sz2Aj6ZqZS6e5Jjlu Bu7WetjUBS11cH0MAg4TOuSbC+7KlW+QFi9BRjYY3hcSxedfDhhOAeY3wk21atf/3csX Fnmw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=JRbLnUin36Rg4fWvwvlbnUhu6IY5yhPXmi1IS4LZ5YU=; b=pXKJ87/XeP6Df9JvG5q5+UsfL5cJniinDs/y82S2UlB14uY+7+saUqpAifMaZwMclu H5GqSaIkyvkoPHCX3rRFeNFXOMrHNnISr0Fe2u6YjPpFGwU04swS/7H0/tZiAY4LxSFB oC+tp90Jq2VIl2/Kd7NTk2okt0Rx0qA5FeO+TCJrxfpX5C1dYIO/sVbuctW4k7zXXTuY 1oW1IkD0RoziKKJrmw5jXltZdM3q/HIy5FI6CaPJu+lw2j9nFchd5+eON78hXT6KTUdq zqAtJtVyIPFCpW3SROndIinauZHUAs5DBxEsZlXA/lMIcfPkSoLjujEGFh3stJ6WXAEL PrXg== X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ1REaGrbciuvf6UWEz1rT0OFH35ANjl7nS0H3OEm6vHeBhr2kCC hP24rEsHf505hYv92/4Dm2mzUYjA X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vvV5oVSB0zJ150R9XFSf9SAp6EiCuVniHku7+wATxWEKyiArZEhXMlkHjftjkC+aeAFZxpRxA== X-Received: by 2002:a7b:c354:: with SMTP id l20mr16314485wmj.40.1584199135570; Sat, 14 Mar 2020 08:18:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.14] (cpc84253-brig22-2-0-cust114.3-3.cable.virginm.net. [81.108.141.115]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id a1sm44994825wru.75.2020.03.14.08.18.54 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 14 Mar 2020 08:18:54 -0700 (PDT) To: internals@lists.php.net References: <50BD013E-CF72-414C-BBC0-A7A2E45CBDDB@pmjones.io> <0B40E6E5-342F-4D81-9CAA-A0C0739A7718@pmjones.io> <102D234E-BC5D-42B2-ABC4-93980C1F76A4@pmjones.io> Message-ID: <9c8064d1-52cf-c31d-f023-e323b5c2dce5@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2020 15:18:53 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-GB Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] RFC: Server-Side Request and Response Objects (v2) From: rowan.collins@gmail.com (Rowan Tommins) On 13/03/2020 20:36, Larry Garfield wrote: > * The RFC by design is trying to take the super-globals and make them OOPy; no more, no less. > * The super-globals are not based on HTTP. They're based on CGI, which is sort of but not quite an HTTP request. > * So... call it CgiRequest/CGIRequest? (I am also ignoring capitalization.) Because that's what it is: It's CGI request data wrapped up into an object, no more, no less. This makes a lot of sense to me. I also just realised that it would make sense to rename $_SERVER in the object, the same way $_GET has become "query" and $_POST has become "input". Maybe $request->cgi or something? CGIRequest->cgi might feel awkward, but it's no worse than the current ServerRequest->server, and I think naming it that way gives a better hint as to why the array has such an odd collection of things in it. Regards, -- Rowan Tommins (né Collins) [IMSoP]