Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:109009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 32932 invoked from network); 14 Mar 2020 12:38:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 14 Mar 2020 12:38:34 -0000 Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C17F7180089 for ; Sat, 14 Mar 2020 04:00:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT, FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-ASN: AS15169 209.85.128.0/17 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from mail-ua1-f47.google.com (mail-ua1-f47.google.com [209.85.222.47]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Sat, 14 Mar 2020 04:00:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ua1-f47.google.com with SMTP id l7so4647177uap.8 for ; Sat, 14 Mar 2020 04:00:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=lhqBWCKfKmYZwmmY3S1+nJkIuikVpKc3I40Dc9kPz+g=; b=qr77znI+dHD+ODLu2ZzvRjIGOV3VeDlJvn4fNBh2Wlp+iT6QR2hIlVF4VhDMD+8kkG 7gCqEGeN/xV74Ogcp4WYii1p6OU0ePOSZXRqU1ePCsnatFmJIYFTS55BaUDFRXeJV7AP XkdmUVzjMEhTulPtbxzDVGnHFfC/ljaIddIdLyFArY7gjY7Q9Knv77movl31X2+lcvh8 qXhPeis0citCkU9ue10iHqYfrwagcCducXdKdIGP5razTdFG9cfk3RJ9n1+pkasIysXy ABb1REJlI9GmPjtXVlJNCdd2DR1we8rzHuXIfpoX0e9otGzoT7LmtbpdCRbgKVxhxq3g 2NDQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=lhqBWCKfKmYZwmmY3S1+nJkIuikVpKc3I40Dc9kPz+g=; b=OS2Vgkibolumr53l4hle/Cp9dGd2ls5fsbS86crjFoLYd448ihbGj3/mdh8ul2t21g cdQgCtt3Oa9eVs1l7raua3XOKyjRkw9W6w2jDqiAs7TbjbQ+kX2+LWL2flCRLuEyz671 ClDzwMOscMYyMQQ0JXOT5sxdKUwLlGjIcwUbQY3Pjximw+IUgp55GjMlYBA0D+w8Y/nu Yt3x8T/cpE/Go+YLY6hafBPcaYSqejU68bJnBjmBCS/FBtKX6hMGslvWSPsazLd7TDsM FRkbrt1KVfm4suFMAtpSHMvR5OKuDsfV3DMCszRQV1mPvoTIFUEqyMaKixqPpQFTui8g 3XBw== X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ0Y1D7nPvO3MXT1Jagw7Wgxq3NfTIaA0GVlZCV88bmBw16NQidw mQ94XWSl68aL5775GUPmQ6FQPtyYsUqtrw7sRwJYWA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vs4U66I/LuoqRJaI8wqE1ihdIbbvNYT8aEbnkNZ1sHZiMrVZL6xp7L1bhWSwDnTVzdNryp8cfqLdzC+zKW6m0g= X-Received: by 2002:a9f:2ac3:: with SMTP id d3mr11316650uaj.110.1584183622231; Sat, 14 Mar 2020 04:00:22 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <8545d15e-ddd5-42be-8405-09697a077234@www.fastmail.com> <4d9688fe-cc57-44af-903e-05f4cbb1bbcc@www.fastmail.com> <6bcbf0a5-92d8-4cfa-a00f-e0e967fc037e@www.fastmail.com> <700327df-45d5-47ca-8828-d7ad9c9bee2e@www.fastmail.com> In-Reply-To: <700327df-45d5-47ca-8828-d7ad9c9bee2e@www.fastmail.com> Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2020 12:00:09 +0100 Message-ID: To: Larry Garfield Cc: php internals Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000000fea0405a0ce7e4a" Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] [DISCUSSION] Immutable/final/readonly properties From: kocsismate90@gmail.com (=?UTF-8?B?TcOhdMOpIEtvY3Npcw==?=) --0000000000000fea0405a0ce7e4a Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thank you, Larry, for your response! I share your opinion. However, I'd be curious if there is anyone who doesn't? As things currently stand, I plan to start the vote on Monday with an unchanged proposal (+ an extended future scope section). M=C3=A1t=C3=A9 --0000000000000fea0405a0ce7e4a--