Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:108955
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAEPJdunSr8PkBtSLO8g_JMLzM4cFVnXsQSEMFmu2RN25XT=grw@mail.gmail.com>
 <2227A758-3035-4A43-974C-C4461A096DFB@newclarity.net> <CALKiJKqD=rZLN9r999byR=bDVhjiKLJ1ODKqZbwmfY9AojooSg@mail.gmail.com>
 <C31E4316-F6C5-40D2-8534-9202392E1C25@newclarity.net> <ba266a18-2fec-0477-b306-6dfe71e407e9@alec.pl>
 <854D29ED-C2EA-4201-87EB-CE561F630F37@newclarity.net>
In-Reply-To: <854D29ED-C2EA-4201-87EB-CE561F630F37@newclarity.net>
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 16:28:04 +0100
Message-ID: <CAEPJdumw2v2Nj5Uzjc6P7cPcbACnjMgayou9345CU+YtTaX0WQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mike Schinkel <mike@newclarity.net>
Cc: Aleksander Machniak <alec@alec.pl>, PHP Internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000c51a0605a081c4b8"
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Attributes v2
From: kontakt@beberlei.de (Benjamin Eberlei)

--000000000000c51a0605a081c4b8
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 4:04 PM Mike Schinkel <mike@newclarity.net> wrote:

> > On Mar 10, 2020, at 7:53 AM, Aleksander Machniak <alec@alec.pl> wrote:
> >
> > On 10.03.2020 12:43, Mike Schinkel wrote:
> >>>> Alternately, why not use this (which is probably the best option
> IMO)?:
> >>>>
> >>>> function foo() attributes
> >>>>       SingleArgument("Hello"),
> >>>>       Another\SingleArgument("World"),
> >>>>       \My\Attributes\FewArguments("foo", "bar") {}
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> This particular example leads to complications with how different
> keywords
> >>> stack up; would the return statement come before the "attributes"
> keyword?
> >>
> >> How does the return statement affect this example?  The return
> statement would be inside the braces, the attributes would be before the
> braces.
> >
> > I think he meant return type declaration. That's why the question about
> > the `use` clause is as well relevant.
>
>
> If that is the case that makes a little more sense.
>
> But even so, the question is surprising because we have a well established
> existing pattern with extends and implements clauses, for example:
>
> function foo():returntype
>         extends Parent
>         implements Interface1, Interface2, Interface2
>         attributes Attribute1, Attribute2, Attribute3 {}
>
> Just to make sure you don't run in circles in this discussion thread here,
even when syntax is not fixed yet, it's not going to be a syntax where the
attributes are suffixed after the declaration. It would maybe some other
characters like %[Attr].


> -Mike
> --
> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>

--000000000000c51a0605a081c4b8--