Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:108952 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 11431 invoked from network); 10 Mar 2020 16:33:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 10 Mar 2020 16:33:03 -0000 Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D44C1804F2 for ; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 07:54:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-ASN: AS15169 209.85.128.0/17 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from mail-lf1-f41.google.com (mail-lf1-f41.google.com [209.85.167.41]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 07:53:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lf1-f41.google.com with SMTP id l7so2110284lfe.13 for ; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 07:53:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=CGhuu9zdhEOfB8KD3lb8mJfdiAjdDzzwbpB/oUSRluo=; b=NT8euXkue40HRXJDgyl9JXp3zZo2ikBnQ+nBmTzdF62AQo19DWEY0LDWVt6b6z5RZC d7hQX6bBiNHQ9O965dk0sABdIm9A44l7oHCO+QO8bnuHqNfCTjxWqHSScbbJxN9+mAJ9 Zn0/H9GoKM72QOxkrDNV6AGJ4jGjH1HigwNd5G3BFfbshi4ARgejQxPSXlNMPV8XcPJ5 HMbGX5uQWyuH3EpUHGBTj8UghGjlLW7MOxAX2OGhP0p1De0S4R0gFFyQkOESvVrMznCm ThkH26OFLqrHT3JfbN7vgrwugaeqLZikWU7GHuKNYWVPmzJptjZSuEckdbVkj32pOZZ6 MWmQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=CGhuu9zdhEOfB8KD3lb8mJfdiAjdDzzwbpB/oUSRluo=; b=BYaUACfnNltL1GuBKurM693QA4Y63aNiSHDR6Nxw5q6nCnuAdyEKjdnAVCE2u47rbB EeWui+jyhevmJdZ69FMph7LB46vVHVpFTgrdUT/v08nK6esM2ONpgMnWApr8UXvOhrfp tW1gNnJ9iJSX1UIQN34r3usw+/qraNTwMpr50Mc0o4QJVctgm6NTG78kotXrjxdGSMb+ keLg6ZjL8LP2NPQF+nTtU/gTeYoaW9WCG8jzqDKbfc+BvftWMRDSUqzJ18yZlnYiHWeQ SknwO6XfqGkHnlxXNdr5jR2v/IBOUjnIspYXiGtz97WcysKr/2iEujT8vQmRtMZUM/Nb NsWg== X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ0gkePfWit5y0xG2CTYlJZwndCTLLkm3P3Bad2UpA7DGqWre6e5 YZiHXBNRA/I7vXW1NGJphb7QyrOPNfiAWP2PfpQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vsWckDZvbe3KB9EjoZYnRtExkCY4nGbfXhQBM0dwcAlJTCwcgXVO4AXi383EdqkV7Qrc05aMmILHWDZgzs6BCs= X-Received: by 2002:a19:5e06:: with SMTP id s6mr13254315lfb.154.1583852038134; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 07:53:58 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1715830.3Z3xILz1Hf@mcmic-probook> In-Reply-To: <1715830.3Z3xILz1Hf@mcmic-probook> Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 15:53:41 +0100 Message-ID: To: =?UTF-8?Q?C=C3=B4me_Chilliet?= Cc: PHP internals Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000001c1f4d05a0814a08" Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] Object-based token_get_all() alternative From: nikita.ppv@gmail.com (Nikita Popov) --0000000000001c1f4d05a0814a08 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 12:36 PM C=C3=B4me Chilliet < come.chilliet@fusiondirectory.org> wrote: > Hello, > > I know I=E2=80=99m late, but shouldn't these tokens have a __toString() m= ethod? > It=E2=80=99s not listed in rejected features. > Would __toString() return $token->text? I'm not strictly opposed to this, but I'd be hard pressed to think of a situation where I would prefer writing (string) $token over $token->text. Generally, the less magic the better :) Nikita --0000000000001c1f4d05a0814a08--