Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:108916
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAEPJdunSr8PkBtSLO8g_JMLzM4cFVnXsQSEMFmu2RN25XT=grw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CALKiJKqit6xcZtDVzCjbHtd9Sxs+_aFLfUgSnFcaGsje_9tw8w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALKiJKqit6xcZtDVzCjbHtd9Sxs+_aFLfUgSnFcaGsje_9tw8w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2020 19:52:56 +0100
Message-ID: <CAEPJdukJ3N=kbqL0i8DpahgKqxNKFuVfUzQ3iUD9MgTaHPZNPg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Rowan Tommins <rowan.collins@gmail.com>
Cc: PHP Internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000008d938f05a070836a"
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Attributes v2
From: kontakt@beberlei.de (Benjamin Eberlei)

--0000000000008d938f05a070836a
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

On Mon, Mar 9, 2020 at 6:18 PM Rowan Tommins <rowan.collins@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi Benjamin
>
> On Mon, 9 Mar 2020 at 14:43, Benjamin Eberlei <kontakt@beberlei.de> wrote:
>
> > I want to resurrect Dmitrys Attributes RFC that was rejected for 7.1 in
> > 2016 with a few changes, incorporating feedback from the mailing list
> back
> > then and from talking to previous no voters.
> >
> > The RFC is at https://wiki.php.net/rfc/attributes_v2
> >
>
>
> Thanks for picking this up again. It's amazing how deeply the integration
> of annotations has embedded into PHP without any support from the language,
> so this feels long overdue.
>
> One quick suggestion: the use cases currently appear inside the Proposal
> heading in the RFC, and some but not all are labelled "not part of the
> RFC". It might be useful to have a clearly separate "Possible Use Cases"
> header, and a summary somewhere of which interfaces and classes would
> actually be provided by the initial implementation.
>

Thank you, I didn't notice that before in the ToC view, fixed!

>
> Regards,
> --
> Rowan Tommins
> [IMSoP]
>

--0000000000008d938f05a070836a--