Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:108790 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 40105 invoked from network); 28 Feb 2020 17:07:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 28 Feb 2020 17:07:01 -0000 Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60A3318055E for ; Fri, 28 Feb 2020 07:25:11 -0800 (PST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-ASN: AS29169 217.70.176.0/20 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from relay5-d.mail.gandi.net (relay5-d.mail.gandi.net [217.70.183.197]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Fri, 28 Feb 2020 07:25:10 -0800 (PST) X-Originating-IP: 107.223.28.39 Received: from samurai.attlocal.net (107-223-28-39.lightspeed.nsvltn.sbcglobal.net [107.223.28.39]) (Authenticated sender: pmjones@pmjones.io) by relay5-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A24941C0019 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 2020 15:25:07 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.0 \(3608.60.0.2.5\)) Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2020 09:25:05 -0600 References: <50BD013E-CF72-414C-BBC0-A7A2E45CBDDB@pmjones.io> To: php internals In-Reply-To: <50BD013E-CF72-414C-BBC0-A7A2E45CBDDB@pmjones.io> Message-ID: <1657AB79-5CAF-4BCA-96B5-1343EC703CCD@pmjones.io> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.60.0.2.5) Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] RFC: Server-Side Request and Response Objects (v2) From: pmjones@pmjones.io ("Paul M. Jones") Hi everyone, All outstanding issues on this RFC appear to be resolved one way or = another. With that in mind: Are there any members here who currently expect to vote "no", who have = not yet chimed in? I'd like to hear your criticisms and objections, so I = can at least attempt to resolve your concerns. I am especially interested to hear about technical or = developer-experience shortcomings, but of course variations on "this is = better left to userland" are understandable. Again, and as always, my thanks for your time and attention. --=20 Paul M. Jones pmjones@pmjones.io http://paul-m-jones.com Modernizing Legacy Applications in PHP https://leanpub.com/mlaphp Solving the N+1 Problem in PHP https://leanpub.com/sn1php