Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:108633
To: Mark Randall <marandall@php.net>, "internals@lists.php.net"
	<internals@lists.php.net>
Thread-Topic: [PHP-DEV] Re: Straw poll: Places to allow function calls in
 constant expressions
Thread-Index: AQHV5TVGaQlwvBZF+k68DGwMXa9nx6gerWUAgAABZLw=
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2020 03:00:23 +0000
Message-ID:
 <DM5PR07MB3067B455C686EB95FF5C3B5FF9160@DM5PR07MB3067.namprd07.prod.outlook.com>
References:
 <CY4PR07MB306346D5C035C0BE8AB30195F9160@CY4PR07MB3063.namprd07.prod.outlook.com>,<5167444a-efce-44dc-a83c-079b58ad3fe2@BN8NAM11FT058.eop-nam11.prod.protection.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To:
 <5167444a-efce-44dc-a83c-079b58ad3fe2@BN8NAM11FT058.eop-nam11.prod.protection.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-CA, en-US
Content-Language: en-CA
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-tmn: [gj326/YvhZTfZwQZgXMIhHmAww194rvO]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-incomingheadercount: 45
x-eopattributedmessage: 0
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 39dbcd28-1d02-48d4-0f4c-08d7b355886f
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BN8NAM11HT100:
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info:
 9kGbrokfhG1KXuh0iIu75lmWT/U0F0I2zxbsrirejPNu0hlHqTdUBH/whszHroWijQYuliAJlW7a/C8d27jaMmLtAOs3qlonsDftAWssAjkhm5Nn3M8uXSz7kj+FN9sIADNRBkhCBUF3AoWeTpGS4LljByy8nxCdAybvJ40A6isiwq/onyo15V1VsSxTt+2lIrIux0iYH8v3QCjKIcn4YAF9vKFGQtWvpseRWETLI6M=
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata:
 210H9GWXQzHYpXbZ8VQGqxZLuMBZ7YkIKwS5IZu4NDPl/dRYmnJUYeNx3QepOdos3Q3q8TB5lMEXx0NnIlESkuuVoqG45qeCDghmwyHyhTTRRIgaVpKl+w0ABolryKfdQGlL64AOwTBzQ2jwsDhMqg==
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: hotmail.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-RMS-PersistedConsumerOrg: 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 39dbcd28-1d02-48d4-0f4c-08d7b355886f
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-rms-persistedconsumerorg: 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 17 Feb 2020 03:00:23.7956
 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Internet
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BN8NAM11HT100
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Straw poll: Places to allow function calls in
 constant expressions
From: tysonandre775@hotmail.com (tyson andre)

> > I've created a straw poll at https://wiki.php.net/rfc/calls_in_constant=
_expressions_poll ,=0A=
> > to measure interest in allowing calls in different types of constant ex=
pressions.=0A=
>=0A=
> I've yet to make my mind up for most circumstances, although I'm leaning=
=0A=
towards a general "No".=0A=
> =0A=
> What I can't express on this strawpoll though, is that I would =0A=
> unequivocally vote against "any function or method call" in all =0A=
> circumstances.=0A=
=0A=
Thanks for the feedback.=0A=
When reading the poll results, I was planning to interpret both "whitelist =
of function calls" and "no"=0A=
as a plan for a "no" vote on any RFC I would write that did allow "any func=
tion or method call",=0A=
in the absence of any response otherwise.=0A=
=0A=
You definitely have a point that it doesn't include complicated reasons suc=
h as "yes on whitelist, less preferably yes on any function/method", or "ye=
s on any function, definitely no on a whitelist".=0A=
=0A=
But I felt like adding too many voting polls or options would discourage re=
sponding to a request for quick feedback,=0A=
and that any more detailed feedback such as this or implementation details =
could be included in this email thread.=0A=
=0A=
- Tyson.=