Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:108501 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 12675 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2020 22:53:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 11 Feb 2020 22:53:12 -0000 Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0F1018054F for ; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 13:07:11 -0800 (PST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, SUBJ_ALL_CAPS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-ASN: AS15169 209.85.128.0/17 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from mail-oi1-f176.google.com (mail-oi1-f176.google.com [209.85.167.176]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 13:07:11 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-oi1-f176.google.com with SMTP id p125so14201888oif.10 for ; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 13:07:11 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=dR8rx3TcmgTa7kN5H4AYx4sSwZfNQJDT/Ps4ENx8jvM=; b=tqTLPcZMg/ypX8M2LsuTHF5noRr6Fk2oaB6xa+oeVWDl5P5YV5ohaAAleZx5YUTIZz ZKo4Wv6nR+NUgqtQMLnA1lKk22U5gkLZylyQDSMEJXPl/NedWcfizSaxXnspMSQkUyL6 HyUYkgBflAeRY9buT/Q8ppJGyuIgQYc2fSQHEAlF5UcQsdOHRERu2Zdz79AfuYbHnjf+ maN7jXV9CfhHH5swG2WAAX7vdcpD7G+c1hmZqj/WUQs+q/zLzmYW4sFfCVzDN3ucDIli 7AknFbHn7d65T1fM70QasjdXbxKNwz0EN+JYqcxFhPP/WTNzbHKIiI/3srJrYWea796g CKYQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=dR8rx3TcmgTa7kN5H4AYx4sSwZfNQJDT/Ps4ENx8jvM=; b=rgg/G2voJt1HkZld2JnpwWNdVMeBrrAL/AfHicio4p9yDTX5Kbc7ZvqO1SkmUVOvYh 8qZLc/5w7n9b82pa2rosCa/2ybrmy1Tuju4cK6hy+OnSIFAdHvsG9tkqfEhKzt/Xelsf GbIqJHTqyEyFm5K/hG6L4XBVZFXaW8UaeIyOVfywCfHhdcxSCLzBmLPuj3eqH0Wz37YF jfjpR9YakeFucwenaZNZk4E+C1TJkB+M/Sr3J9vNFi/26RLbiCCvG7eYfF0/zP6Wii57 XjcGb3Sw/BtojN2k8/rh23Y8oKUlxMpluoYRIVpOko18T9H2FwfI80u7SthNgGp5yVsd 5V9w== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWLCfRClp1EPvdBmhRkGhUWCIxCZldFyj5q/jfdxKtGEoxez5tW Rh0Mmly25UfnRcWJAomE6vXqcR2nromzXz4UUuQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzTwFC+aSDTSNs+MhtzfnE8zrn4RH1MJLg3Ba0U7R9ecJXmQd8D0q3Sd1j2C2alETSO8lxZ+y6NV5XeUBQsT30= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:3b4:: with SMTP id n20mr3999722oie.78.1581455227584; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 13:07:07 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <7ee31c90-627b-c46f-de20-fed7b589034d@freedom.nl> In-Reply-To: <7ee31c90-627b-c46f-de20-fed7b589034d@freedom.nl> Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2020 22:06:53 +0100 Message-ID: To: Dik Takken Cc: Manuel Canga , Dan Ackroyd , Nicolas Grekas , Diogo Galvao , PHP Internals List , Nikita Popov Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000118588059e533dcc" Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] From: michal.brzuchalski@gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Micha=C5=82_Brzuchalski?=) --000000000000118588059e533dcc Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable wt., 11 lut 2020, 21:14 u=C5=BCytkownik Dik Takken napisa=C5=82: > On 11-02-2020 20:01, Micha=C5=82 Brzuchalski wrote: > > wt., 11 lut 2020, 18:42 u=C5=BCytkownik Manuel Canga > > napisa=C5=82: > > > > That reminds me an old draft RFC https://wiki.php.net/rfc/short-closure= s > > where I thought curly braces can be used to create closure from syntax > > nearly the same as invoking but without parentheses. > > My message mentioning just about the same idea crossed yours. Thanks for > pointing at this RFC, I think it just caught our attention again. :) > > I quickly scanned the list to see if your RFC was discussed and all I > could find was threads about a different RFC with almost identical name > (https://wiki.php.net/rfc/short_closures). Has it not been discussed > before? > No, it hasn't been discussed. It stopped at being a draft. BR, -- Micha=C5=82 Brzuchalski > --000000000000118588059e533dcc--