Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:108476 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 22803 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2020 14:45:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 11 Feb 2020 14:45:34 -0000 Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0AF818053A for ; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 04:59:28 -0800 (PST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-ASN: AS6830 91.118.0.0/16 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from mail.thelounge.net (mail.thelounge.net [91.118.73.15]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 04:59:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from srv-rhsoft.rhsoft.net (Authenticated sender: h.reindl@thelounge.net) by mail.thelounge.net (THELOUNGE MTA) with ESMTPSA id 48H2sn0tt5zXSW; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 13:59:25 +0100 (CET) To: Albert Casademont , Jan Schneider Cc: internals References: <50BD013E-CF72-414C-BBC0-A7A2E45CBDDB@pmjones.io> <20200211093357.Horde.rLSaCIKR44fKvPJyltsdQC_@yunosh.horde.org> Organization: RH Software Message-ID: <3b6074d8-bfd5-41a4-1a86-4ce57f91904d@rhsoft.net> Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2020 13:59:24 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.4.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] RFC: Server-Side Request and Response Objects (v2) From: harry@rhsoft.net ("Reindl Harald (privat)") Am 11.02.20 um 13:42 schrieb Albert Casademont: > This is very interesting, thanks! > > Would it make sense to also add an INI setting to disable superglobals and > response functions? no because changing basic language behavior that way is not helpful for code meant to run everywhere and not stop working just because tomorrow someone changed a random ini setting