Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:108474 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 19723 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2020 14:43:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 11 Feb 2020 14:43:23 -0000 Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCEED1804AB for ; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 04:57:17 -0800 (PST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, SUBJ_ALL_CAPS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-ASN: AS15169 209.85.128.0/17 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from mail-lf1-f51.google.com (mail-lf1-f51.google.com [209.85.167.51]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 04:57:17 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-lf1-f51.google.com with SMTP id z18so6936557lfe.2 for ; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 04:57:17 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=epg84wgKdc+0tM6bBz/SkABKLScwk77Mwx/Ii65324Q=; b=ay55cONIMkJATyelfBTvCCiN9eCc3HUMOyr+tbs4lOlVHhJ/GKAFpo6VXHRelMymQs +M937x6FxslsB1X/PdIo9ZyxHJ+IbwsHKhY3YCjDXGhMJg+mN7ExNSDn8QG4ITvKgzIS exLlXqb20iLfOZTi20VficSv4deMVzDfKcA2vLjtjDnaRBPlZPb3RF6sGPJy4Keku1yP iph7vDNKV5VizjAicGcQ1ZWrJZlmk0fO7lFwII/VFHfYgMZzkifSuw5vX2WWa9VAbl2N TH/Qodu5fV29PUeF/R5p1pD17I2lrnSeIZZQM+lE9SZe7b1MGXBjl7mSh9jAViUqh1H1 GiuQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=epg84wgKdc+0tM6bBz/SkABKLScwk77Mwx/Ii65324Q=; b=gD6neZfuGvvn6u9z1ZBYxyO7gESqVmr48r1tU2Tg8n9BdxROg/rbJjykF6Y45PSHKR 4ErAnyCX8FfDfJ59u6ZvTwpQEDIIgRftJ6qRmCCw7QPivVfMDAPaBfBXT14P4hNLbk4m D8MwvML1pKhsg5zECnJkZZaSOhjkr0fomPlxRogJBxxB8QC0jbLVHBLHoPrbtfiC9uOr aVBcENiFfi8Dy1zauYYiZdsguvZZBlIdwi+FyxwRe3FrrbN+XHrqjBFMYU0mHHHPT7GY WCsLua/C6DvYDTfXkxzlvQkjXhF8UF/PmWfeVq2Nxbqcxpf6LDpYgTYPSEYP96PnMHgd hjQw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVnJFLRj603El89foIjv0g/OZP4sz5SbrT0jPlcOC9VTFGHO44E Tq6KdQlkli3svHQfU9me/NtMkB2AUEJEtHmrVVo= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwkzcFmHsSEdx6BiITLb/es7sIIGIkw85JhM3YAeACck7PfkouobRpH7ZSDT5jdbz057lFZYbcUz7FgHY4lfn4= X-Received: by 2002:ac2:4199:: with SMTP id z25mr3670204lfh.26.1581425836007; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 04:57:16 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2020 13:57:04 +0100 Message-ID: To: Guilliam Xavier Cc: Diogo Galvao , PHP Internals List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] From: manuelcanga@gmail.com (Manuel Canga) Ups!. What big mistake! Then ::function should be a better option. Thanks, Guilliam, On Tue, 11 Feb 2020 at 13:47, Guilliam Xavier wrote: > > Hi, > > On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 1:09 PM Manuel Canga wrote: > > > > I was thinking about 'function' or 'func'. 'function' is more > > semantic, but 'func' is used with "short functions"( PHP 7.4 ) and > > these will be used for callbacks. Then I think 'func' will be more > > consistent. > > Actually PHP 7.4's short closures / array functions use `fn`, not `func`. > But `::fn` would look... weird. > I agree with Diogo that `::function` would be more consistent. > > -- > Guilliam Xavier