Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:108320 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 59776 invoked from network); 29 Jan 2020 18:31:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 29 Jan 2020 18:31:12 -0000 Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBD48180554 for ; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 08:41:53 -0800 (PST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-ASN: AS15169 209.85.128.0/17 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from mail-oi1-f176.google.com (mail-oi1-f176.google.com [209.85.167.176]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 08:41:53 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-oi1-f176.google.com with SMTP id z2so339469oih.6 for ; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 08:41:53 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=jX3DO4oBGCW5kkHDaFFPjkNjO+PZ8kCI4k5NtOuvfX0=; b=eol771aG5JeuS7vdkuzByWRVYX/Fp+EAyATangbBa3WUIgg9Xul0I5SX3wQdaWie2Q Hb/l45XdI54F5wHWsKv9oelq+996y0e/j2fVJyJmW/EHWpxh05UKpZ8G5bRljinzcohF 7LP4eOgC6MzsmIysGa4eXXumHyB7TTYB9rZfWuKwNZXw7yGG7rEf9i3XUyfiXdBU0W9o q8/EvNpUNCmTXnKSx3lP58ZbZH5+3TD8c47PGIXU7XpwStT8x+N7UW22wDuoMRVfuCrj nxH6RNOn8QnC/2CQ8ZeyxAap9FIGTu9gTt1xOv5p5tXeAhMRv6So0xBwLH5zD/6adLEi iY2g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=jX3DO4oBGCW5kkHDaFFPjkNjO+PZ8kCI4k5NtOuvfX0=; b=WndtowkamuwjmB7vvGpEZEi0GBM1elQeFQ9U/81shvcSwJ/8mL7KmbAQ+NuAzbiKR8 Q7Hlg7X1W2j80OE01MqmvZr1iwjdfUZyMK2mJc2L3lmB4yURmaY1GVyTxoLrWwRNg7V5 WEHCKOTCiKpvviWZpaHtdJ926QcMVigRRgcgP9IB4Vhy0HgkouD8KRBa9ZPIAyM4eK79 6FYIjGu0Wc5Xme0HquJgwQFG/kP5vuSkmrqMRPDxp09xt5Tz7vneCgMgYaHukTblgcka UXdgnuBhMmRNYVpVBy4ik+MWm0FSk6vbhynW3NRNoppL6S9hl0xtnrbQJ17xTQ/xT9Hs SIkg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVkkVw23kWI++mfrVL1KSt8JWSu42K4piHdIVEX0RR3ptemJ/Tt TQclQAV92y1ykNiSl5KW/DOjWIjE X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqx7KBk/kJBbKqBeF6RQzquv2lfea+ITTmYyMmxWqWouuwkpmjYlKVAyqO4eeY8GvKoh9iA4AA== X-Received: by 2002:aca:af09:: with SMTP id y9mr6593745oie.101.1580316112636; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 08:41:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-oi1-f169.google.com (mail-oi1-f169.google.com. [209.85.167.169]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r2sm836815otk.22.2020.01.29.08.41.51 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 29 Jan 2020 08:41:51 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-oi1-f169.google.com with SMTP id a142so330513oii.7 for ; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 08:41:51 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 2002:aca:1c09:: with SMTP id c9mr7211134oic.85.1580316111012; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 08:41:51 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <3ca6d665-1a4f-8f7a-c82a-2e899f2e8df1@gmail.com> <44ba543d-b6eb-888b-9ed5-0f1e9d3b53b9@gmail.com> <8E382251-AE41-4BD9-A5F8-135D11B9E10D@newclarity.net> In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2020 16:41:15 +0000 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: To: PHP internals Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000006e1cfd059d4a04ee" Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Add viable long running execution model to php 8 From: phpmailinglists@gmail.com (Peter Bowyer) --0000000000006e1cfd059d4a04ee Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Tue, 28 Jan 2020 at 17:12, Rowan Tommins wrote: > I'd just like to point out that those two things are orthogonal: the fact > that Swoole is distributed as an extension is not the reason it's > incompatible with your existing code, and building a similar implementation > into PHP under a different name wouldn't make the migration any easier. > You're absolutely right. The difference I'm thinking is that if there is built-in support in the language, frameworks will embrace it. At the moment I'd need to make my own fork to add compatibility with Swoole et al (or use one of the experimental but unsupported forks out there), which isn't attractive. Peter --0000000000006e1cfd059d4a04ee--