Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:108038
Return-Path: <benjamin.morel@gmail.com>
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 68647 invoked from network); 8 Jan 2020 17:14:55 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5)
by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 8 Jan 2020 17:14:55 -0000
Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 399D1180532
for <internals@lists.php.net>; Wed, 8 Jan 2020 07:20:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_NONE,
SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
X-Spam-ASN: AS15169 209.85.128.0/17
X-Spam-Virus: No
X-Envelope-From: <benjamin.morel@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-ot1-f49.google.com (mail-ot1-f49.google.com [209.85.210.49])
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256)
(No client certificate requested)
by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS
for <internals@lists.php.net>; Wed, 8 Jan 2020 07:20:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ot1-f49.google.com with SMTP id h9so3870448otj.11
for <internals@lists.php.net>; Wed, 08 Jan 2020 07:20:16 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to
:cc;
bh=I1m8+73btMzDnP8nqMyHkoBym0JwblHH0vk/25cGBH0=;
b=oWrv8mp4AqHKdxE5JjqVd6eugGVpZVYBFMuKrcaPA+tnKPAUboaPUvJyUGHWXhG9pS
dE8AX+3Zf3DNp1vq508ncoeNsqMWQd/Im06qJAYdRcxDR2BsvmrplsCI/6b6qBniJ8rq
2gSg1gq2al+H/4+Tn07zh7TcHp5OCDGma8Mv1uKT0/uf7gdfiS8LMR7lEOuunUwgIklM
LVr854D4aE12IX+ssbBRacJ41Va4GgvMWdfSiLapCjMjrQLVj+BM3mKryPQ5W3d/3Xse
jEERG8PCLdk0yDvnHaDoiqLI87z0Ccv2rqy1z3+u5e/H/QZTTzdIxKp4h4My2HV3HHMw
s66g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
:message-id:subject:to:cc;
bh=I1m8+73btMzDnP8nqMyHkoBym0JwblHH0vk/25cGBH0=;
b=OIkxXdH5aUY8Su77PoUWkZxa+E4vqWjj0mI9HDHtRwxnr9qmY4Ifmr1hZzeGPC+qhW
2AFV0VsE0YC89YYOLwGdsBCIKwXbKVjn6MF5HMtEEAxLg7iETx/VMakAx3HEDXo5D/Cc
ElRIQ/1Fp42T6FPOnigiHyPDUew//xrCJooRS7xbTEpp0fjjfU+pd/GIadkU0s27FoSP
P1G04UErh0ebLEBUq+XNhh2FKzG4mlQSM0QIv1Es0ThOKa5FOrhJTYZHIgn8EnrN5SwE
d6WCSWsWZK6HKkGahuYtrvCpGwfc3F3JtlhX23iE7VraT5axUfhJdHRYd9Zu5ODk913H
DtzA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWi8z6pkqMIe9CstGjLkEJliI7hTSclyUWtBYtPI+wOHvlaYpl3
EwwDSGKafOlcoZ2gRzFM9d5zbN46i7fJc2H2a1M=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyh9zneSZEfWoQA3gol1bvD0YKgRIIuEY1DJbKiVNSbFJmkLJYntCNG9+3mGs667Q5EkYGNbDcEUBaOC2Ccezs=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:184:: with SMTP id q4mr4618045ota.232.1578496812981;
Wed, 08 Jan 2020 07:20:12 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAF+90c-vPOmHzjoDFNi3m+iTgfz6dJep1DAHuCFcQDctjeEJMg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAF+90c-vPOmHzjoDFNi3m+iTgfz6dJep1DAHuCFcQDctjeEJMg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2020 16:20:02 +0100
Message-ID: <CAG9XoMRwReJuzB=vT-3MZAWHcd8g=RR+TpfO6Rz=F47xi6aYwA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Nikita Popov <nikita.ppv@gmail.com>
Cc: PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000d120cd059ba26d2f"
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Static return type
From: benjamin.morel@gmail.com (Benjamin Morel)
--000000000000d120cd059ba26d2f
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> I would like to propose the following RFC, which allows using "static" as=
a
> return type:
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/static_return_type
Big +1 from me as well. I actually asked why this wasn't supported back in
2015:
static return type in PHP 7 interfaces
<https://stackoverflow.com/q/30952876/759866>
=E2=80=94 Benjamin
--000000000000d120cd059ba26d2f--