Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:108038 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 68647 invoked from network); 8 Jan 2020 17:14:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 8 Jan 2020 17:14:55 -0000 Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 399D1180532 for ; Wed, 8 Jan 2020 07:20:20 -0800 (PST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-ASN: AS15169 209.85.128.0/17 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from mail-ot1-f49.google.com (mail-ot1-f49.google.com [209.85.210.49]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Wed, 8 Jan 2020 07:20:16 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ot1-f49.google.com with SMTP id h9so3870448otj.11 for ; Wed, 08 Jan 2020 07:20:16 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=I1m8+73btMzDnP8nqMyHkoBym0JwblHH0vk/25cGBH0=; b=oWrv8mp4AqHKdxE5JjqVd6eugGVpZVYBFMuKrcaPA+tnKPAUboaPUvJyUGHWXhG9pS dE8AX+3Zf3DNp1vq508ncoeNsqMWQd/Im06qJAYdRcxDR2BsvmrplsCI/6b6qBniJ8rq 2gSg1gq2al+H/4+Tn07zh7TcHp5OCDGma8Mv1uKT0/uf7gdfiS8LMR7lEOuunUwgIklM LVr854D4aE12IX+ssbBRacJ41Va4GgvMWdfSiLapCjMjrQLVj+BM3mKryPQ5W3d/3Xse jEERG8PCLdk0yDvnHaDoiqLI87z0Ccv2rqy1z3+u5e/H/QZTTzdIxKp4h4My2HV3HHMw s66g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=I1m8+73btMzDnP8nqMyHkoBym0JwblHH0vk/25cGBH0=; b=OIkxXdH5aUY8Su77PoUWkZxa+E4vqWjj0mI9HDHtRwxnr9qmY4Ifmr1hZzeGPC+qhW 2AFV0VsE0YC89YYOLwGdsBCIKwXbKVjn6MF5HMtEEAxLg7iETx/VMakAx3HEDXo5D/Cc ElRIQ/1Fp42T6FPOnigiHyPDUew//xrCJooRS7xbTEpp0fjjfU+pd/GIadkU0s27FoSP P1G04UErh0ebLEBUq+XNhh2FKzG4mlQSM0QIv1Es0ThOKa5FOrhJTYZHIgn8EnrN5SwE d6WCSWsWZK6HKkGahuYtrvCpGwfc3F3JtlhX23iE7VraT5axUfhJdHRYd9Zu5ODk913H DtzA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWi8z6pkqMIe9CstGjLkEJliI7hTSclyUWtBYtPI+wOHvlaYpl3 EwwDSGKafOlcoZ2gRzFM9d5zbN46i7fJc2H2a1M= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyh9zneSZEfWoQA3gol1bvD0YKgRIIuEY1DJbKiVNSbFJmkLJYntCNG9+3mGs667Q5EkYGNbDcEUBaOC2Ccezs= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:184:: with SMTP id q4mr4618045ota.232.1578496812981; Wed, 08 Jan 2020 07:20:12 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2020 16:20:02 +0100 Message-ID: To: Nikita Popov Cc: PHP internals Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000d120cd059ba26d2f" Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Static return type From: benjamin.morel@gmail.com (Benjamin Morel) --000000000000d120cd059ba26d2f Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > I would like to propose the following RFC, which allows using "static" as= a > return type: > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/static_return_type Big +1 from me as well. I actually asked why this wasn't supported back in 2015: static return type in PHP 7 interfaces =E2=80=94 Benjamin --000000000000d120cd059ba26d2f--